If someone's wrists are so weak they can't handle that I wonder how they've made it past their teenage years tbhNo one who’s played sport at any level over the age of four would roll their hand over at that point unless they want to smash their wrist to smithereens and star in the sequel to Edward Dildohands.
How was it not out?I don't say this to be a dick, truly. But is there anyone who isn't Australian who thinks that was out?
His home ashes record is a bit strange really, is not like Australia have been particularly good with the bat in England during his career. Really not helped by getting injuries in 2015 and 19 when he was at his peak.Anderson isn't done, he's always been kinda meh in the Ashes. Once he gets to bowl to India again he'll start averaging low 20s.
I just saw it. I'm not even sure it should have been out. It's not what I expected. He grounded the ball almost right after catching it.I don't say this to be a dick, truly. But is there anyone who isn't Australian who thinks that was out?
@Victor Ian first brought up the inconsistency and manifest injustice of the Root catch being given and Starc’s not. I just piled on because it’s so obviously trueI just saw it. I'm not even sure it should have been out. It's not what I expected. He grounded the ball almost right after catching it.
Burgey makes an important point though, if Starc's wasn't out then Joe Root's catch of Head the same day shouldn't have been either. Whichever you slice it it's inconsistent umpiring and it's heavily benefited England.
I don't even notice English cheating most of the time these days, it's become such a mundane part of cricket@Victor Ian first brought up the inconsistency and manifest injustice of the Root catch being given and Starc’s not. I just piled on because it’s so obviously true
Neither am I now, having read the law:I just saw it. I'm not even sure it should have been out. It's not what I expected. He grounded the ball almost right after catching it.
Burgey makes an important point though, if Starc's wasn't out then Joe Root's catch of Head the same day shouldn't have been either. Whichever you slice it it's inconsistent umpiring and it's heavily benefited England.
By that measure Harry Brook had complete control over the ball which got him out, because it ended his momentum.Apparently complete control= end of momentum. Still vague.
Joe roots looks grass- but camera angle doesnt show it.I just saw it. I'm not even sure it should have been out. It's not what I expected. He grounded the ball almost right after catching it.
Burgey makes an important point though, if Starc's wasn't out then Joe Root's catch of Head the same day shouldn't have been either. Whichever you slice it it's inconsistent umpiring and it's heavily benefited England.
Because the ball touched the ground and we have eyes.How was it not out?
Have you got the footage or still to show the ball touching the ground.I just saw it. I'm not even sure it should have been out. It's not what I expected. He grounded the ball almost right after catching it.
Burgey makes an important point though, if Starc's wasn't out then Joe Root's catch of Head the same day shouldn't have been either. Whichever you slice it it's inconsistent umpiring and it's heavily benefited England.
I think England will still be 50 in arrears by the time the 9-over hour finishes at best tbhHopefully it’s all done by midday
Benjamin Andrew StokesNice Sunny day at Lords
Bazball’ can be England’s greatest strength and weakness today.
They chased three targets in excess of 250 against New Zealand a little over a year ago,
and also chased 378 against India playing their new trademark aggressive brand of cricket. So no target will be beyond the reach of this unafraid English side, and they know that till Benjamin Andrew Stokes, the man for the big occasions, is at the crease, there is always hope!!