It was an Umpires Call. What the heck are you talking about?The heck are you talking about? The ball was cleanly hitting the stumps on the first appeal. It would've absolutely been given out if referred.
Missing the point; DRS takes the whole 'different umpires' bit almost completely out of the equation, hence the angst. Has little to do with the fact a decision was given against him, more to do with a better system being available but not used for stupid reasons.i don't understand why people make a big fuss about umpires not giving batsmen out when the ball's hitting leg stump, for example...
benefit of the doubt goes to the batsman remember..ALWAYS!!
If theres doubt you have to rule the decision in the batsman's favour.
for more than 100 years thats how the lbws have worked.
if you keep making brave calls, sooner or later you are bound to get some wrong... thats why it's better to play it safe (batsmen have only 1 chance)- should rule doubtful decisions in batsman's favour
cook should not have been given out but **** happens. thats how it is.
different umpires make different decisions..
didn't expect him to do well in this series. had doubts about his technique. (i'll try to dig up that post)Is struggling a bit against the pitched up swinging ball.
Aaaah!! I see.And where do your curses for umpires go when they give Indian batsmen out in this way?? Huh?Not a lot you can do when given out by **** umpiring.
But isn't it the Indians that are concerned about the predictive path? The further a batsman is down the wicket, the bigger the predictive path is. Therefore, there is a larger margin of error.Then first one was going to be given not out because of it being 2.5 metre out just to clarify, even if it was hitting the middle of leg. This is a weakness of the system if it was implemented.
When?Aaaah!! I see.And where do your curses for umpires go when they give Indian batsmen out in this way?? Huh?
But it hasn't happened.Aaaah!! I see.And where do your curses for umpires go when they give Indian batsmen out in this way?? Huh?
Yep. Indians are concerned for the predictive path which showed it just missing the stumps for the one he was given out too. Can't just hide behind the weakness of the predictive path and the system in one instance.But isn't it the Indians that are concerned about the predictive path? The further a batsman is down the wicket, the bigger the predictive path is. Therefore, there is a larger margin of error.
Oooh!!! Really!! It has happened in the past.Not much of evidence in current series (if I am not wrong),but the previous series against WI.But it hasn't happened.
I wasn't hiding.Yep. Indians are concerned for the predictive path which showed it just missing the stumps for the one he was given out too. Can't just hide behind the weakness of the predictive path and the system in one instance.