That would have been when the pitch was a sticky as hell but was expected to dry out a bit by the time the proper batsmen came in. I vaguely remember reading about something similar in the 1950 series, or maybe it was just some very low scores in one of the matches.Just looking at the scorecards for that series. In the third test Bradman entirely reversed the batting order, and they put up 564 with Bradman getting 270. When was the last time a captains done that?
Bad news i'm afraid. This is officially the sporting year when British sportsmen don't choke!That's something we can agree on, social
half the ball outside the centreline of the leg stump. everything is centreline of the stumps now - pitching, hitting, and prediction (which i mentioned looked like it was done wrong to me at tb)How the **** is that umpire's call?
Sounds like a group of Cricketers that Pews (remember him) would get excited about.it is
ESPNcricinfo @ESPNcricinfo 10m
RT @mohanstatsman: High% of LBWs (min 50 inngs) D Ebrahim 31% S WATSON 30% M Sinclair 29% D Ganga 28% RS Mahanama 28%
some great success stories there
this aussie thing of not having test standard batsmen isn't going to work more generallyThis Aussie thing of having 2, 3, 4 being lefties is not going to work. Especially as they aren't any good.
one of your finer momentsno ****ing idea how i accidentally closed the thread
I assume that means the bounce would be extremely unpredictable, and the logic is that anyone has pretty much the same chance against it, so why not put the pawns first etc., but would it really be much different to the context of an extremely green, seaming wicket? The best batsman still have to ride their luck on those.That would have been when the pitch was a sticky as hell but was expected to dry out a bit by the time the proper batsmen came in. I vaguely remember reading about something similar in the 1950 series, or maybe it was just some very low scores in one of the matches.
as proud as matt prior is right nowone of your finer moments