• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* Second Test at Lord's

91Jmay

International Coach
This Aussie thing of having 2, 3, 4 being lefties is not going to work. Especially as they aren't any good.
 

wpdavid

Hall of Fame Member
Just looking at the scorecards for that series. In the third test Bradman entirely reversed the batting order, and they put up 564 with Bradman getting 270. When was the last time a captains done that?
That would have been when the pitch was a sticky as hell but was expected to dry out a bit by the time the proper batsmen came in. I vaguely remember reading about something similar in the 1950 series, or maybe it was just some very low scores in one of the matches.
 

Ruckus

International Captain
I can;t believe there was a rumor floating around at some point that hughes was actually decent at playing spin
 

NUFAN

Y no Afghanistan flag
it is

ESPNcricinfo ‏@ESPNcricinfo 10m
RT @mohanstatsman: High% of LBWs (min 50 inngs) D Ebrahim 31% S WATSON 30% M Sinclair 29% D Ganga 28% RS Mahanama 28%

some great success stories there
Sounds like a group of Cricketers that Pews (remember him) would get excited about.

On that Hughes dismissal, I mean, how on earth did he not defend it. England are bowling good, but all 3 wickets have been due to our batsman's inability to put the bat in line with the ball.
 

Uppercut

Request Your Custom Title Now!
This is a proper minefield now. The toss might have been too important even if Australia had remembered what sport they were playing.
 

Cabinet96

Hall of Fame Member
Reminds me of Melbourne and Sydney when Swann and Bresnan came in and just choked the scoring rate.

And just like in Melbourne Prior misses a stumping off Clarke.
 

Ruckus

International Captain
That would have been when the pitch was a sticky as hell but was expected to dry out a bit by the time the proper batsmen came in. I vaguely remember reading about something similar in the 1950 series, or maybe it was just some very low scores in one of the matches.
I assume that means the bounce would be extremely unpredictable, and the logic is that anyone has pretty much the same chance against it, so why not put the pawns first etc., but would it really be much different to the context of an extremely green, seaming wicket? The best batsman still have to ride their luck on those.
 

ajdude

International Coach
my parents have it on GEM with a 2ish second delay from my austar, i just heard "ooh missed stumping missed stumping missed stumping missed stumping"
 

Top