superkingdave
Hall of Fame Member
Oh, and...
No, because we're not playing at Edgbaston. Next Test is Trent Bridge; one after that is Headingley. Then it's, of course, The Oval.
Haha FAIL
We're not playing at TB
Oh, and...
No, because we're not playing at Edgbaston. Next Test is Trent Bridge; one after that is Headingley. Then it's, of course, The Oval.
Obama's Perm impersonation, or the erstwhile walrus-thing?Richard said:WTF is with that avatar?
Oopsie. Now kindly dispense with the straw man, Dorothy. Answer the question.No, because we're not playing at Edgbaston. Next Test is Trent Bridge; one after that is Headingley. Then it's, of course, The Oval.
When did they change it from Trent Bridge to Edgbaston?Haha FAIL
We're not playing at TB
But why are you avatar-ing it?Obama's Perm impersonation, or the erstwhile walrus-thing?
The answer is that it's kinda pointless to speculate on selection mid-match. Just wait and see what happens for the rest of the match. A lot can change.Oopsie. Now kindly dispense with the straw man, Dorothy. Answer the question.
Because I'm sick of Gillespie and I'm sick of tasteful watercolour impressions. Do I have to justify everything?But why are you avatar-ing it?
Kee-rist. Isn't that what forums are for?The answer is that it's kinda pointless to speculate on selection mid-match. Just wait and see what happens for the rest of the match. A lot can change.
That's exactly what Ponting plans. He dropped the catch off Siddle so Mitch can get the wicket instead and he can have an excuse to keep bowling him.It'd be typical of Mitchell Johnson to take a wicket now and take the plaudits of the fantastic work done by Siddle and the Hilf before him.
Depends where Lee is at but Clarke would be a massive chance to come in I would think.Given it's fairly likely we'll be 1-0 down in roundabout 48 hours, do you think there's any chance (note: includes those of cats in hell) that Johnson or Hauritz could be dropped for Clark for Edgbaston?
Frankly, I'd be prepared to take my chances. At least we know what depths Clark can plumb; Johnson prefers to lower our expectations on a per-Test basis.
Maxwell on 5 Live said he spoke with Lee yesterday and Jim didn't think Lee had a chance for the 3rd test.Because I'm sick of Gillespie and I'm sick of tasteful watercolour impressions. Do I have to justify everything?
Kee-rist. Isn't that what forums are for?
A newborn primate with a dartboard could tell you Lee will come in for a seamer. Nobody needs to be told that conceding 400 in consecutive Tests is nigh-on unacceptable for an attack with pretensions towards world-beating.
Do you think Clark will join him? That was the question.