I suppose if they lost 3 early wickets (fairly likely) then maybe attack becomes the best option. Probably just wishful thinking though.No way England are going for it.
Williamson dangled a bit of a carrot in the first test this summer (273 at less than 4rpo) and we never once looked like anything other than survival was on our minds.
The same reason why NZ didn't get to 400 after being 250/3 on a couple of occasions. England's bowling is pretty good (today excepted), and even if you get a good start, a night's rest will bring them right back into the contest.No it's a slight on India's batting. How did they not get to even 400 after the start they had?
shami 100The only reason to bat is to let Bumrah get his 50
Way stranger things have def happenedNo point in declaring, you're not getting ten wickets today no matter what happens
hmm it's about knowing what your best ball is and what kind of tailender you're bowling to. bouncers to tailenders with a good eye can be a lottery but length often goes the distance too. the most important thing to do is stick to your plan and hold your nerve, don't get frustrated or try to cover all bases.I don't have any objection to it but I think it's usually the wrong strategy. People love the idea of "softening people up" but it's just as likely to make them more determined and focused. Everyone who isn't Pat Cummins needs to realise that they are not Pat Cummins.
Bowling to tail-enders is always a bit of a lottery, but when you bowl it on the stumps you give yourself more tickets.