thewizard1o1
International Debutant
But damn the game looked good on the big screen in the CW Bar...AUST_HiTMaN said:Gah, sorry for not showing up fellas.
Great win thou blacks, hopefully i can be a wee bit more useful in upcoming games...
But damn the game looked good on the big screen in the CW Bar...AUST_HiTMaN said:Gah, sorry for not showing up fellas.
Sorry.thewizard1o1 said:I seem to remember Liam mentioning that there was to be a home ODI only series this season. Don’t quote me thou .
I'm pretty sure it was agreed that either loans would come into play or else that grade cricket names would move up temporarily to take their places?Neil Pickup said:Liam, do we have home ODIs or Tests this season?
What if: Chaulk, Butler, Wilson, Hoy, Thompson, Kearsley and Pickup get called up again? Then I have nine players...
AUST_HiTMaN said:Sorry.
It will have to be looked into. For the moment there's not too much urgency though. Captaincy are free to start up a discussion though, as trading is open all season long.marc71178 said:Ouch, looks like the loaning thing might be called into play here - unless the captains can get together and agree that rather from having 18-18-18-16-15, it's made an equal 17 across the board?
We only have a few home ODIs on the card this season. For those matches, a squad of 12/13 will be named for a max. of 2 matches at a time. The 12th(and 13th) man(/men) will be released to play domestic cricket on the match day. That means that 11 players will be unavailable at a given time, and it's doubtful that Thompson and Wilson will play at the same time. Granted, that still means you only have 10 players...Neil Pickup said:Liam, do we have home ODIs or Tests this season?
What if: Chaulk, Butler, Wilson, Hoy, Thompson, Kearsley and Pickup get called up again? Then I have nine players...
As of March 12.cricketboy29 said:Btw, where are the standings shown? I cant seem to find them...
Sorry, Neil. The exuberance of youth showing through... I guess.Neil Pickup said:Argh... Harry! Why!
An interesting choice. He was outscored by two players and he only took one wicket (and a catch). Surely Borcich would have been MOTM with 6-27 in the second innings, if not Watt for 7-72 in the first innings?Samuel_Vimes said:Man of the Match: Marc Robbins
The partnership was instrumental. It gave Borcich and Watt 100 runs to play with in the second innings, which they did to perfection.Loony BoB said:An interesting choice. He was outscored by two players and he only took one wicket (and a catch). Surely Borcich would have been MOTM with 6-27 in the second innings, if not Watt for 7-72 in the first innings?
You could have had worse. Think my debut was 3-0-25-0 or summat in the (now defunct) 25Smash tournament.Bobisback said:whoa, 3 on debut, and i didnt bowl, i could have went oh so much better, but regardless nice win reds!
Maybe making up for other missed MOTMLoony BoB said:An interesting choice. He was outscored by two players and he only took one wicket (and a catch). Surely Borcich would have been MOTM with 6-27 in the second innings, if not Watt for 7-72 in the first innings?
I got a 4-fer on my debut, you guys are all crap.steds said:You could have had worse. Think my debut was 3-0-25-0 or summat in the (now defunct) 25Smash tournament.
Yeah, well, who's laughing now?chaminda_00 said:I got a 4-fer on my debit, you guys are all crap.