thewizard1o1
International Debutant
But damn the game looked good on the big screen in the CW Bar...AUST_HiTMaN said:Gah, sorry for not showing up fellas.
Great win thou blacks, hopefully i can be a wee bit more useful in upcoming games...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bbe05/bbe056153f9715869177d2936cd901b30e5fd04d" alt="Unsure :unsure: :unsure:"
But damn the game looked good on the big screen in the CW Bar...AUST_HiTMaN said:Gah, sorry for not showing up fellas.
Sorry.thewizard1o1 said:I seem to remember Liam mentioning that there was to be a home ODI only series this season. Don’t quote me thou.
I'm pretty sure it was agreed that either loans would come into play or else that grade cricket names would move up temporarily to take their places?Neil Pickup said:Liam, do we have home ODIs or Tests this season?
What if: Chaulk, Butler, Wilson, Hoy, Thompson, Kearsley and Pickup get called up again? Then I have nine players...
AUST_HiTMaN said:Sorry.
It will have to be looked into. For the moment there's not too much urgency though. Captaincy are free to start up a discussion though, as trading is open all season long.marc71178 said:Ouch, looks like the loaning thing might be called into play here - unless the captains can get together and agree that rather from having 18-18-18-16-15, it's made an equal 17 across the board?
We only have a few home ODIs on the card this season. For those matches, a squad of 12/13 will be named for a max. of 2 matches at a time. The 12th(and 13th) man(/men) will be released to play domestic cricket on the match day. That means that 11 players will be unavailable at a given time, and it's doubtful that Thompson and Wilson will play at the same time. Granted, that still means you only have 10 players...Neil Pickup said:Liam, do we have home ODIs or Tests this season?
What if: Chaulk, Butler, Wilson, Hoy, Thompson, Kearsley and Pickup get called up again? Then I have nine players...
As of March 12.cricketboy29 said:Btw, where are the standings shown? I cant seem to find them...
Sorry, Neil. The exuberance of youth showing through... I guess.Neil Pickup said:Argh... Harry! Why!
An interesting choice. He was outscored by two players and he only took one wicket (and a catch). Surely Borcich would have been MOTM with 6-27 in the second innings, if not Watt for 7-72 in the first innings?Samuel_Vimes said:Man of the Match: Marc Robbins
The partnership was instrumental. It gave Borcich and Watt 100 runs to play with in the second innings, which they did to perfection.Loony BoB said:An interesting choice. He was outscored by two players and he only took one wicket (and a catch). Surely Borcich would have been MOTM with 6-27 in the second innings, if not Watt for 7-72 in the first innings?
You could have had worse. Think my debut was 3-0-25-0 or summat in the (now defunct) 25Smash tournament.Bobisback said:whoa, 3 on debut, and i didnt bowl, i could have went oh so much better, but regardless nice win reds!
Maybe making up for other missed MOTMLoony BoB said:An interesting choice. He was outscored by two players and he only took one wicket (and a catch). Surely Borcich would have been MOTM with 6-27 in the second innings, if not Watt for 7-72 in the first innings?
I got a 4-fer on my debut, you guys are all crap.steds said:You could have had worse. Think my debut was 3-0-25-0 or summat in the (now defunct) 25Smash tournament.
Yeah, well, who's laughing now?chaminda_00 said:I got a 4-fer on my debit, you guys are all crap.![]()