Who said they're better? Here's a tip: established Test players do struggle at domestic level at times... like all human beings.marc71178 said:So tell me how many rookie players come into real cricket as better batsmen than established Test players then?
Mr Mxyzptlk said:Who said they're better? Here's a tip: established Test players do struggle at domestic level at times... like all human beings.
T Loganathanmarc71178 said:Also morale-wise, can we have:
Loganathan
Gray
Iyer
Nayak
Bennett
And Stuart Williams, Daren Ganga, Graeme Hick, Mark Ramprakash and Rikki Clarke all score runs at domestic level. It works both ways. What's your point?Blaze said:In some countries (especially the weaker ones) they tend to dominate though. Look at NZ. Craig McMillan fails at international level time and time again but then goes back to domestic cricket and smashes bowling attacks to all parts.
Wahoo! I'm not rock bottom!Mr Mxyzptlk said:SA Bennett
Morale: Poor
sounds like me last season!Blaze said:In some countries (especially the weaker ones) they tend to dominate though. Look at NZ. Craig McMillan fails at international level time and time again but then goes back to domestic cricket and smashes bowling attacks to all parts.
Go the Colts!! Who's our next opponent?NZTailender said:Colt's will bounce back. We're all about bouncing back...
You told us actually.Mr Mxyzptlk said:Who said they're better? Here's a tip: established Test players do struggle at domestic level at times... like all human beings.
It happens from time to time. What I object is your obviously targeting the Colts because they played well against your team who has a quality bowling line-up. It was a one off, we have hardly been world beaters and we are not leading the comp by 100 points so I find your rookie power argument to be quite weak. Rookies tend to be inconsistent and that is what we (the Colts) have been. Occasionally rookies have a very good day and quality bowlers have an off day. Live with it!marc71178 said:So tell me how many rookie players come into real cricket as better batsmen than established Test players then?
Ah, thats good to seeMr Mxyzptlk said:GN Nayak
Morale: Fair
The thing is, I am not targetting them for any reason that you state, I am continuing to highlight the inequalities.Mister Wright said:It happens from time to time. What I object is your obviously targeting the Colts because they played well against your team who has a quality bowling line-up. It was a one off, we have hardly been world beaters and we are not leading the comp by 100 points so I find your rookie power argument to be quite weak.
Except that the fact that they're not dominating shows that there are no inequalities, just like last season.marc71178 said:The thing is, I am not targetting them for any reason that you state, I am continuing to highlight the inequalities.
When did I say that that Dev League rookies are beter than established Test players? Quote me.marc71178 said:You told us actually.
If these rookies are set up with better simming averages (and one of them also doubles as a keeper who rarle seems to drop anything) - then over time they're bound to perform better (!)
There is your quote MarcMr Mxyzptlk said:Only a handful of rookies have better simming averages than experienced players.