*Official* Season 10 Club Check-in

[Chubb]

AJ Fensome

No Team

 

[Magrat Garlick]

Håkon Mørk

CW Red

 

[TIF]

Dhamaka Singh
No team

 

[cbuts]

Chris Butler
CW Black

 

[_Ed_]

Richard Edmunds
Red

 

[Loony BoB]

I swore I signed in on this... DP Towns, CW Colts.

EDIT: That has it as...

_Ed_
33/3from3.3
age_master
ash chaulk
AUST_HiTMaN
Barney Rubble
BlackCap_Fan
Blaze
Blewy
broncoman
bryce
Buddhmaster
bugssy
burkey_1988
cbuts
chaminda_00
chooka_nick
Chubb
cometer
cricketboy29
crickhowell
dinu23
Dizzy #4
Don
Dydl
FaaipDeOiad
Hoggy31
Jamee999
James90
Jungle Jumbo
kears_falcon_9
KennyD
kwek
Loony BoB
Majin
marc71178
Matteh
mikeW
Mr Mxyzptlk
Neil Pickup
new_age_ar
Nnanden
NZTailender
Paid The Umpire
Prince EWS
PY
Resha
Right arm fast
Robertinho
roseboy64
Samuel_Vimes
Slats4ever
steds
superkingdave
The Baconator
thewizard1o1
TIF
Tom Halsey
Travis_Teh
wrangler203

EDIT: Oh captain my captain. Also, I'll get Dan (Majin) to sign in if needed, but I think anyone who has been posting actively in the Club Cricket thread should be fine to stay in, really.

 

[Majin]

DK Rai

Yeah I'm still around. I sign in, sorry. Liam knew, at any rate.

 

[marc71178]

Also, I'll get Dan (Majin) to sign in if needed, but I think anyone who has been posting actively in the Club Cricket thread should be fine to stay in, really.

If people are so active, why do they need reminding to post in a thread?

 

[Majin]

If you must know, I wanted to wait on Liam to post the trades first because he wanted to wait to announce the trades.

 

[Magrat Garlick]

If people are so active, why do they need reminding to post in a thread?

Cos it's not that easy to spot?

 

[marc71178]

Are the "new post" indicators not enough any more then?

 

[Loony BoB]

Since new threads are so rarely made in this forum, I tend to rely on the User CP for threads I post in, especially during the off season. That's why I'm always slow to pick up on new threads but once I spot them, I'm active in them.

 

[Magrat Garlick]

Since new threads are so rarely made in this forum, I tend to rely on the User CP for threads I post in, especially during the off season. That's why I'm always slow to pick up on new threads but once I spot them, I'm active in them.

Same here.

 

[roseboy64]

Satisfied Marc?

 

[marc71178]

I fail to see how a big blob can be ignored if someone is supposedly active in a forum.

 

[Prince EWS]

I actually agree with Marc this time. I have been known to stand up for members marc decided were inactive before, by pointing out that they simply could have been reading the forum and keeping up with their progress without actually replying much. However, if they are reading the forum regularly and keeping up with their progress, they will see the Check-in thread and post in it. If they cant manage to do this without being reminded, then they arent truely active as far as I'm concerned. The only possible argument against this is the fact that it is the off-season, but as far as I know, most Dev League players play Club Cricket as well, so they should be visiting here to check their progress in it.

As long as people can post in this thread reasonably quickly, Im happy that they are active.

 

[Loony BoB]

Does my explanation need to be accompanied by screenshots? I just explained how. And I think I did it in a pretty understandable manner, too. I know some people need visual aids when reading, though, so just say the word and I'll break out the images with a more in-depth look as to how someone can be active in this forum without seeing a new thread. I'll try to use small words and I'll say it slowly.

 

[Prince EWS]

Does my explanation need to be accompanied by screenshots? I just explained how. And I think I did it in a pretty understandable manner, too. I know some people need visual aids when reading, though, so just say the word and I'll break out the images with a more in-depth look as to how someone can be active in this forum without seeing a new thread. I'll try to use small words and I'll say it slowly.

I dont consider that to be "active" though. That's just keeping tabs on thread you've already posted in.

Someone that is active will find this thread - even you did under your system.

 

[Loony BoB]

I always find the threads pretty late, though - all I'm saying is it's entirely possible to be active and to overlook a thread in which you have to reply to within x days in order to make it to next season. The main reason I'm pointing all of this out is because the thread was started in the middle of the club season - and I was actually quite surprised to see this threads as I'm not used to dev league and club cricket threads overlapping (time-wise). Even a simple reminder in the club cricket thread would have been nifty. I imagine, after all, that we want to keep active players. There may not be many of us that use the User CP / Subscriptions in order to keep up with things, but every person counts in a system where some squads have 14 players and may well end up with less than 11 during international callups.

EDIT: And keeping tabs on threads you've already posted in is pretty much being active (well, assuming you actually post in said threads), given that new threads in these forums are few and far between - often a month or two will go by without a new thread being started.

 

[Prince EWS]

EDIT: And keeping tabs on threads you've already posted in is pretty much being active (well, assuming you actually post in said threads), given that new threads in these forums are few and far between - often a month or two will go by without a new thread being started.

No it isnt. Being active involves reading all the new threads as well. If your current thread reading tactics dont allow you to do this, change them.

I always find the threads pretty late, though

You still found it though, which means any others that use your subscription system should be able to find it as well.