Only heard a couple but he's fantastic.Also, what's SCSA's podcast like?
PPVs don't draw anymore anywayOh god, Fastlane on the same night as the Oscars? This will draw well.
Doing the HHH one now.Only heard a couple but he's fantastic.
Pretty much. PPV buys are way down from what they were pre-network but Vince is all about that guaranteed income.So what's their business model these days? WWE Network?
So they're still basically under pressure to sell every PPV every month, assuming people don't renew for a meh card. Basically the same model at a lower price.Nope. They originally had a six month commitment, but now it's month to month
I mean before they announced feb was free, it was an automatic two week free trial, a bit like netflix, so you could in theory time it with a PPV. I imagine they bin the free trials around mania time though.
For a tenner a month though it's well worth it if you like WWE. It's a goldmine.
Yeah the WWE don't advertise the archive content as much as they should despite it being the best feature.Nope. They originally had a six month commitment, but now it's month to month
I mean before they announced feb was free, it was an automatic two week free trial, a bit like netflix, so you could in theory time it with a PPV. I imagine they bin the free trials around mania time though.
For a tenner a month though it's well worth it if you like WWE. It's a goldmine.
Oh for sure, the cards still have to be good. But it's about getting someone on the hook with a PPV included. If you got a PPV and it was rubbish you might be inclined to not get the next. Whereas if you get the network and Fast Lane is awful, you might get hooked on, say, the Monday Night War series or all of the Clash of the Champions or whatever, and think, might as well keep it and see if Mania is decent.So they're still basically under pressure to sell every PPV every month, assuming people don't renew for a meh card. Basically the same model at a lower price.
edit: I know about the other features as well but I still see them on a monthly cycle as opposed to playing a longer game.
Who else follows that model? Boxing, MMA? The big advantage the WWE has is the exclusive content from decades of broadcast which other organisations won't have.The rollout of the Network is an excellent idea from the WWE's point of view imo. The traditional models of broadcast ppv carriers are dying or already dead in the water. The teething problems they have had with it are hardly surprising, but they're definitely on the right track so far as the future is concerned imo. I imagine lots of companies will start doing similar things in the near future.
You used to get movie channels which operated on this basis too, but they have all but vanished these days, afaik. Everything is moving to on-demand/over-the-top type services these daysWho else follows that model? Boxing, MMA? The big advantage the WWE has is the exclusive content from decades of broadcast which other organisations won't have.
Not just sports imo - carriers like Netflix demonstrate how mainstream media is conceivably heading in this direction as well.I posted an article from forbes about it last week. They think it's the future of sports broadcasting.
Oh yeah TV has already gone that way, which makes sports even more key for TV companies. So something like the network for other sports could be bad, bad news for them.Not just sports imo - carriers like Netflix demonstrate how mainstream media is conceivably heading in this direction as well.
It never died for Jim Cornette.Listening to the Bret podcast, interesting how seriously they took kayfabe back in the day. Can anyone pinpoint the time the "kayfabe era" died? Montreal?