Was referring to the first one. Obviously didn't cost them though.Yeah, looked very plumb.
I figured, Zaman reviewing, it must have been an inside edge. That's something I find very hard to judge, (both watching it on TV from the front, as well as doing umpiring duties myself). But replays clearly showed 'no edge'. I was a bit surprised it was hitting the wicket so high.
You know, speaking of Warne. How ironic would it be if we went through a whole post-Lyon era of tossing around spinners like candy trying to replace him when he retires.Bloody hell, just saw that Lyon is now the 4th highest Australian wicket taker behind only Lillee, McGrath and Warne
Got him already: Labuschagne.You know, speaking of Warne. How ironic would it be if we went through a whole post-Lyon era of tossing around spinners like candy trying to replace him when he retires.
Well at one point he did have two for twenty two.Is Marnus the new Richie Benaud?
Fought well after a horror collapse early-ish on. Quickly showing that he's zaman for a crisis.Geez that's some scorecard to come home to.
What's the pitch like? How did my man Zaman do?
what a FakharFought well after a horror collapse early-ish on. Quickly showing that he's zaman for a crisis.
Though I am somewhat impressed by ML's bowling, I don't think we should get too carried away. His second wicket was very good, but the third was nothing but the batsman's fault.We shouldn't have bothered picking Jon Holland and just played another batsman instead
Are you on a time delay?Say what you will about his batting, Labaschagne has taken two catches and two wickets. That's huge output for a guy who wasn't picked to bowl.
Yeah I wasn't serious. He's just been lucky. He averages 50+ in FC cricket for a reason.Though I am somewhat impressed by ML's bowling, I don't think we should get too carried away. His second wicket was very good, but the third was nothing but the batsman's fault.