• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* Pakistan vs Australia in the UAE 2018

Borges

International Regular
With Mohammad Abbas bowling like he has been doing in this game, Pakistan would probably have done quite well in a day-night game.
 

social

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
There’s just serious issues with our pathways and systems. The talent is there. We’re producing the bowlers. But no batsmen
Friend of mine is a former state player and now a highly regarded coach

He claims that 2 of the best 6 batsmen in Queensland are a couple of guys in late 20s/early 30s but have never been given a chance as weren’t identified at young age
 

TheJediBrah

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Blaming pathways and systems is a pretty easy target but realistically what do you expect to happen when you ban the 2 players who are your best batsmen by far, half your bowlers are "injured" and you then don't even select anything close to the best team available. And you're playing Pakistan in the UAE.

If this happened against Pakistan in Brisbane, with a full-strength side, then I'd start really worrying about pathways and systems.

Having said all that I do actually think there are issues with the pathways, I just don't think it's a major contributor to Aus sucking.
 

Midwinter

State Captain
Blaming pathways and systems is a pretty easy target but realistically what do you expect to happen when you ban the 2 players who are your best batsmen by far, half your bowlers are "injured" and you then don't even select anything close to the best team available. And you're playing Pakistan in the UAE.

If this happened against Pakistan in Brisbane, with a full-strength side, then I'd start really worrying about pathways and systems.

Having said all that I do actually think there are issues with the pathways, I just don't think it's a major contributor to Aus sucking.

I think what you are saying is that despite the pathways an systems there is no depth in the team.

Other than the top 6 players, the rest of the players are just good ordinary cricketers
 

TheJediBrah

Request Your Custom Title Now!
I think what you are saying is that despite the pathways an systems there is no depth in the team.

Other than the top 6 players, the rest of the players are just good ordinary cricketers
I think there's also definitely an issue with selection. Favouritism is rampant and while selecting youth ahead of 30+ year olds has its merits you can't be ignoring Callum Fergusons and selecting Maddinson, Heads and Labuschagnes.
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
Blaming pathways and systems is a pretty easy target but realistically what do you expect to happen when you ban the 2 players who are your best batsmen by far, half your bowlers are "injured" and you then don't even select anything close to the best team available. And you're playing Pakistan in the UAE.
Yeah I think there's slightly something to what GS said, but actually no moreso than any other country at the moment. Not producing Test batsmen who can adapt to alien conditions at all is very much a global trend. It's been exasperated here because of the own-goals from the senior management that were the suspensions of their best two batsmen (and another decent one), the appointment of a horrible coach and the subsequently awful batting selections that followed from that.

Imagine thinking there was enough depth in Australian batting to play in arguably the most alien conditions in a Test series against a good attack while suspending your best two batsmen and still being able to use luxury selection criteria like "hasn't had enough time in the middle in the last couple of weeks" or "hasn't converted enough starts in limited overs cricket" or "is working through some kinks in technique". Those are the sort of tiebreakers you can use when you're playing at home and batsmen are bashing the door down, but not now. If you do it now you just get bad teams and collapses.
 

GotSpin

Hall of Fame Member
Blaming pathways and systems is a pretty easy target but realistically what do you expect to happen when you ban the 2 players who are your best batsmen by far, half your bowlers are "injured" and you then don't even select anything close to the best team available. And you're playing Pakistan in the UAE.

If this happened against Pakistan in Brisbane, with a full-strength side, then I'd start really worrying about pathways and systems.

Having said all that I do actually think there are issues with the pathways, I just don't think it's a major contributor to Aus sucking.
I consider the blaming of systems and pathways as a part of the dysfunctional selection process as well, coaching etc etc
 
Last edited:

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
I think what you are saying is that despite the pathways an systems there is no depth in the team.

Other than the top 6 players, the rest of the players are just good ordinary cricketers
Right but this is perfectly normal. Teams can't just banish their best five or so batsmen and expect the next lot to be better than "good, ordinary cricketers". Whenever this has even possibly been true in Test history it's been a complete aberration - a glitch, a lucky fluke - rather than something you should realistically expect from your pathways program all the time.
 
Last edited:

Starfighter

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Right but this is perfectly normal. Teams can't just banish their best five or so batsmen and expect the next lot to be better than "good, ordinary cricketers". Whenever this has even possibly been true in Test history it's been a complete aberration - a glitch, a lucky fluke - rather than something you should realistically expect from your pathways program all the time.
Has it ever been true? I'm trying to think of a time where teams have missed five or six of their best players​ and not been poor.
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
Has it ever been true? I'm trying to think of a time where teams have missed five or six of their best players​ and not been poor.
I can't think of any instances where it has proven to be true, but teams don't lose their best five or six of their best batsmen (or players) very often for us to see either. There have been times where it's theoretically been true -- players absolutely bashing the door down and not getting extended runs -- and even though I'm actually sceptical of even these times, you could make a case for them. Even if you steel-man the argument and grant that it would have been true at these times (and again, I'm sceptical), it's certainly been exceedingly rare, and probably not something administrators can actively create without a lot of luck.
 

the big bambino

International Captain
Smith, Warner, Starc, Haze, Cummins, Pattinson and Lyon are our only test class cricketers. Atm two are banned and three injured. Even that group is too skint of batting. Outside that lot I’d rate Khawaja and for the future Stanlake and maybe Jhye Richardson. We need all those players available and the remaining positions filled out from whomever of Maxwell, Bancroft, Renshaw, Finch and the Marshes have managed to fluke themselves into some form.
 
Last edited:

Burgey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Renshaw is a test class player. You could tell from watching him play for half an hour. As Cribb said, if he’s fit there’s no way he should be left out.
 

stephen

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Burns, Maxwell, Hughes, Patterson all have better first class records than Labaschagne. Why did none of them get picked? Why was Renshaw left out?

We're not missing our two best batsmen, we're missing possibly 4 or 5 of our best batsmen.
 

Starfighter

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Burns, Maxwell, Hughes, Patterson all have better first class records than Labaschagne. Why did none of them get picked? Why was Renshaw left out?

We're not missing our two best batsmen, we're missing possibly 4 or 5 of our best batsmen.
Ferguson as well.
 

stephen

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
I can't think of any instances where it has proven to be true, but teams don't lose their best five or six of their best batsmen (or players) very often for us to see either. There have been times where it's theoretically been true -- players absolutely bashing the door down and not getting extended runs -- and even though I'm actually sceptical of even these times, you could make a case for them. Even if you steel-man the argument and grant that it would have been true at these times (and again, I'm sceptical), it's certainly been exceedingly rare, and probably not something administrators can actively create without a lot of luck.
The last time this happened to Australia was world series cricket. We got thumped after all of the player bans.
 

ajdude

International Coach
**** there’s a lot to work with with marnus’ bowling. impresses me way more than swepson
 

vcs

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Excellent match from Sohail. He looks like a good Test cricketer. Pakistan are pretty much home and dry here.
 

Top