It's not that he hates this team. It's just that he's a clueless commentator and agrees with what his co-commentator is saying and will exaggerate it to the max. Fazeer mentioned the Pak run rate and Ramiz goes on a tangent about how limited Azhar Ali is blah blah blah.
If Pak were hypothetically 500/6 by lunch on Day 3, he would be waxing lyricals about how successful Misbah's Pak team has been and this is the formula they follow where they slow grind the opposition to dust.
The guy is a complete tool. Doesn't have a clue about any upcoming Pak players either. I remember the Sky team asking him about Sami Aslam last summer and the guy was surprised he had already played a Test in Bangladesh.
I have to disagree a little bit with that. It's not that he agrees with those around him. He just has a very simplistic, surface level understanding of batting like most casual fans which does not understand anything beyond 'aggressive/defensive and 'positive/negative' and 'intent'
His analysis when talking about Pakistan's batting is nothing more than what you will hear on Twitter/FB chatter or from members like Firebreaker on these forums which is either you are a positive player or a selfish negative player which is at it's heart a reading of the game based on Cricinfo scorecard (runs, strike rate, balls played), completely discounting the actual game, the conditions, context, form of the player, situation of the game etc.
As you said, he takes absolutely no interest in Pakistan cricket, can barely give a background on any of the established players like Azhar or Shafiq, let alone a Sami Aslam or an upcoming player who has not even played yet.
The Sky commentators Atherton and Hussain know more about Pakistan cricket than him and since they are also better commentators, they are able to analyse the Pakistan team a lot better than just the facile "aggressive/negative" narrative. This was clear during the test series last year when Ramiz would have a go at Pak batsmen for being slow or Misbah for what he perceived was a defensive field set and then get challenged straight away by Hussain and Athers.
He enjoyed doing commentary with Warne though because Warne also belongs in the 'intent' and 'aggression' camp