They couldDuncan said:60 runs required off 29 balls with one wicket remaining... can they do it?
what? How would it benefit Pakistan they lost one of their better bowlers while WI should be relieved since the prospect of the fastest New Ball pair running at them would just compound thier woes even moreSJS said:Not having Sami benefits Pakistan not Windies
hahaha, i reckon after all these years Liam must be baldLangeveldt said:Liam has amazed me, theres sort of a doomed inevitability..
He either has no hair left, or cannot muster the strength to pull any out because he is so drained from having to watch his team
This is Sami we're talking about...aussie said:what? How would it benefit Pakistan they lost one of their better bowlers
because Laras presence guarantees a better performance ?honestbharani said:Surely, all those guys who say that the Windies play better without Lara can learn something from this?
Hear, here! Forgot about that. Very solid comeback indeed. Now they just need Gul...Richard said:Excellent return to action for Shabbir - not before time, but better good than early.
that's because they are shiteshaka said:I cannot believe WI lost by 50 odd runs, when Pakistan only managed 192.
No, they're not - in Gayle, Sarwan, Lara, Chanderpaul and Bradshaw they have five very fine ODI cricketers, and a reasonable one in Wavell Hinds. Not as many as Pakistan with Salman, Malik, Inzamam, Youhana, Razzaq and Shabbir, plus Afridi in the Hinds category, no, but enough to be far from shite.Nonentity said:that's because they are shite