yes, remember when he destroyed NZ in NZ? recently too I thinkSamuel_Vimes said:Sami a Test match winner?
Yes , but the match was drawnshaka said:yes, remember when he destroyed NZ in NZ? recently too I think
Which Sami, in part, caused because of 27 overs for 126 with 15 no-balls.shaka said:NZ was saved through a huge first innings score
For a start it's not as if the game was that close, and secondly - it's not as if 2 of the players were missing for anything other than their own fault.deeps said:he said 3 best players
inzi
youhana
malik
malik can bowl too! doubt it would have made a huge difference, but they would have made a bigger total in the first innigs and hence had to chase less in the second and had amuch better chance of winnin.g
He needs to maintain consistency - the sort of player he is, it wouldn't shock me if next game he gets a pair!Top_Cat said:Great to see Afridi right on track for my prediction of being the world's best allrounder within two years (3/49 in the second innings after being hammered in the first dig and 122 off 95 balls).
People still support them. They just prefer to do it from home. No sense wasting your hard earned money on the Windies.Langeveldt said:Seen how empty the ground was?? When I was in Jamaica it wasn't Gayle, Sarwan and Lara that the people were talking about at all.. I worry for West Indian cricket, but for teams to excel I guess you have to have teams at the bottom too..
those three players would have made it a totally different game.marc71178 said:For a start it's not as if the game was that close, and secondly - it's not as if 2 of the players were missing for anything other than their own fault.
shabbir shouldnt b in the team, he isnt good enough and ill be screaming that till i get dragged off by wild dogs/horses/dinosaurs...he isnt good enough for pak test team!!!!! nazir should be ahead of him, abdur rauf should be ahead of him...and abdur rauf is probably the 3rd quickest bowler in pak, he swings it too...but we go with shabbir the tall guy with a bent arm.... sadsuperkingdave said:saw Shabbir has been reported again for a suspect action
gotta love how kamal averaging 41 shouldnt be in a side containing butt, hameed and malik.mofo123 said:butt
hameed
akmal
younis khan
inzi
kamal
malik
afridi
razzaq
shahid nazir
kaneria
and kamal is only included coz youhana is unlikely to play...but malik get in ahead of him for the fact he is averaging nearly 49 in his last 5 tests. and i wanna see him play for a long period to prove himself
ok so maybe he does chuck, but how in the world does he suck when he took 5 wickets at 27 in the last game?Duncan said:And not only is Shabbir a chucker, he sucks.
remember when kirtley ran through SA?shaka said:yes, remember when he destroyed NZ in NZ? recently too I think
malik? how can u compare malik, he is averaging 50 this year in tests.tooextracool said:gotta love how kamal averaging 41 shouldnt be in a side containing butt, hameed and malik.
yes in a whole 3 tests....mofo123 said:malik? how can u compare malik, he is averaging 50 this year in tests.
how many bad tests has kamal had?mofo123 said:butt? 2 bad test matches. cant judge him yet, anyway he is a specialist opener, so he cant b replaced with kamal