• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

***Official*** Pakistan in England

wpdavid

wpdavid

Hall of Fame Member
Samuel_Vimes said:
Fair point. I only remember Giles & Gough from that game. Was out watching a gig. :p

Edit: Still 2-1 to Read, though. (*remembers match-winning and series-tying 25-odd in West Indies)
Click to expand...
Plus a more than decent bash against SA in 1999/2000 after the top order had folded in the usual heap. Richard wasn't wrong when he used to regularly point out that Read is a more than handy oneday batsman.

Looks like Akhtar's cleaning up now, but 163 for 9 is about 60 more than I reckoned at one stage. Still can't see us worrying the Pakistanis though.
 
Magrat Garlick

Magrat Garlick

Rather Mad Witch
wpdavid said:
Plus a more than decent bash against SA in 1999/2000 after the top order had folded in the usual heap. Richard wasn't wrong when he used to regularly point out that Read is a more than handy oneday batsman.
Click to expand...
Perfectly suited for No. 8, anyway.

Pakistan are going to chase 170, I think - the rain interruption will up their target somewhat. Are there still heavy clouds there?
 
Magrat Garlick

Magrat Garlick

Rather Mad Witch
superkingdave said:
though if you got bowled out the target wasn't adjusted?
Click to expand...
Don't see why - after all, your resource percentage is changed by the rain.

Cricinfo says it isn't, tho, so I'll have to trust them...
 
wpdavid

wpdavid

Hall of Fame Member
Samuel_Vimes said:
Perfectly suited for No. 8, anyway.
Click to expand...
Yes, I agree. In an ideal world, Dalrymple would bat ahead of him at 7.

Samuel_Vimes said:
Pakistan are going to chase 170, I think - the rain interruption will up their target somewhat. Are there still heavy clouds there?
Click to expand...
There certainly are just south of London.
1st blood to Lewis, I gather.
 
wpdavid

wpdavid

Hall of Fame Member
Steady stuff from Gough & Lewis, but we badly need wickets with the new ball if this is going to be a contest.
 
T

The Baconator

International Vice-Captain
"6.6 Broad to Younis Khan, no run, some width again, and an ambitious Younis goes for a slash but fails to make contact, he's cross with himself"

:laugh:
 
grecian

grecian

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Bring Rikki on.

gawd, I must be getting desperate.

Bad decision by the ump there, I reckon we should walk off the pitch:shutup:
 
grecian

grecian

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Broad bowling uttterly the wrong length, Dominic Cork would have four by now, mascarenas about three.
 
superkingdave

superkingdave

Hall of Fame Member
grecian said:
Broad bowling uttterly the wrong length, Dominic Cork would have four by now, mascarenas about three.
Click to expand...
given that Cork had 0-30 in near identical conditions at Lords last week against lesser batsmen, I'd dispute that.
 
superkingdave

superkingdave

Hall of Fame Member
grecian said:
Yeah, I'm just being miserable, watching England play ODIs tends to do this to me.
Click to expand...
at least you can watch it, my Sky lost signal about 4 hours ago so ihave to listen to blumming Blofeld on tms
 
grecian

grecian

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Well I'm about to turn over to watch Phil Neville play for England, that'll cheer me up.

Even though I actually think Bell, Colly or even Clarke may bowl well on this pitch.

That last comment may be a contender for the "Greigy".
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Top