Stop trolling and saying Pakistan are a disgrace. In effect, Pak were accused of cheating. If Hair has proof they cheated, he has a right to change the ball and the events that followed were entirely of Pak's fault. But if there is no proof, then he just accused the Pak team of cheating based on assumptions. That's ridiculous and has huge implications. Though I don't necessarily support Pak not taking the field, I think they have the right to do it if they think they did nothing wrong. So shut up about your "disgrace" comments and wait until all the facts are out.open365 said:If we did that in India, the crowd would tear the stadium down.
absolute disgrace.
Dunno, Just because the TV cameras didnt pick it up, didnt mean it didnt happenPY said:I don't know if it was a huge over-reaction Rich, if you'd been accused of cheating and penalised on the spot then you would be pretty darned peeved if you hadn't done it!
Is it fake indignation or genuine?
Yea you'd be very annoyed at that moment. But they've had time to think about it, speak with managers, coaches etc. and they come up with this rubbish so they've completely relinquished any moral high ground anyway.PY said:I don't know if it was a huge over-reaction Rich, if you'd been accused of cheating and penalised on the spot then you would be pretty darned peeved if you hadn't done it!
Is it fake indignation or genuine?
Langeveldt said:I think this is a niggly bit of bad umpiring by Hair, in that even if there was ball tampering, it was so minor, and could have been sorted with a simple "I've seen what you're doing, don't do it again".. Combined with a huge Pakistani over-reaction
Langeveldt said:Dunno, Just because the TV cameras didnt pick it up, didnt mean it didnt happen
Scaly piscine said:Yea you'd be very annoyed at that moment. But they've had time to think about it, speak with managers, coaches etc. and they come up with this rubbish so they've completely relinquished any moral high ground anyway.
The only one trolling seems to be you. Whether they tampered with the ball or not this reaction is still a disgrace.Fusion said:Stop trolling and saying Pakistan are a disgrace. In effect, Pak were accused of cheating. If Hair has proof they cheated, he has a right to change the ball and the events that followed were entirely of Pak's fault. But if there is no proof, then he just accused the Pak team of cheating based on assumptions. That's ridiculous and has huge implications. Though I don't necessarily support Pak not taking the field, I think they have the right to do it if they think they did nothing wrong. So shut up about your "disgrace" comments and wait until all the facts are out.
Langeveldt said:Are Pakistan worried about losing? England only 40 odd behind
Scaly piscine said:The only one trolling seems to be you. Whether they tampered with the ball or not this reaction is still a disgrace.
Enough is enough ..A man is who has courage to say it in face ..............silentstriker said:Um, huh? So 10 minutes later, after speaking with managers, they should say "Well its ok if we've been called cheats...lets get on"
Sorry, that doesn't work.
They havent already forfeited AFAIKsilentstriker said:They forfeited the game, hence they already lost. So, I don't really understand this point.
There have been 12 overs since the decision, so best part of an hour.silentstriker said:Um, huh? So 10 minutes later, after speaking with managers, they should say "Well its ok if we've been called cheats...lets get on"
Sorry, that doesn't work.
FRAZ said:Great job ... Clown .. Pig .. I was right , you see , I proved myself right .. HUH .
According to the Laws, they might.Langeveldt said:They havent already forfeited AFAIK