*Official* Pakistan in England 2010

[Top_Cat]

Australia have been producing some great examples of mediocre batting of late,so you must be getting a hang of it.

Banter fail, tbh.

Hint: less srs.

 

[GIMH]

Yeah, tend to agree with the rolleyes. You've got to play the referee's call, and Ajmal has not been cited in ages (iirc). Hence, so far as the rules go, it's a legal action. Gets tedious hearing the same digs at it over and over. Even if you want to debate that ruling, tour thread's not really the place.

Disagree, is no different from discussing anything else to do with a player's technique in the thread. If Stuart Broad does something to upset people today I am sure there will be plenty of people posting about it, don't see how people discussing Ajmal's action after he took wickets is any different.

 

[Sir Alex]

Blaming a ****ty techique is one thing and calling his action illegal another...

Besides the same poster has been warned mildly previous times for bringing up the same thing whenever Ajmal is talked about.

 

[GIMH]

He's calling it as he sees it. I've never seen him warned for that, and frankly if he has been it's a disgrace.

And no, I won't accept the referee's decision, why should I when people like you refuse to do so when one of my favourite players is involved...

 

[Jacknife]

Banter fail, tbh.

Hint: less srs.

It isn't a attempt at banter,but thanks for the help.

 

[GIMH]

It isn't a attempt at banter,but thanks for the help.

Pasag's post was mate, that's what he's getting at

 

[Sir Alex]

He's calling it as he sees it. I've never seen him warned for that, and frankly if he has been it's a disgrace.

And no, I won't accept the referee's decision, why should I when people like you refuse to do so when one of my favourite players is involved...

He has been proved wrong as no referee has called him for that. Yet repeating the same again and again is what gets the mods' goat.

 

[Jacknife]

Pasag's post was mate, that's what he's getting at

I thought he was saying my post was a banter fail.Mine was a response to Pasag's post.

 

[Jono]

Brumby has complained about Ajmal even when England were winning the first 2 tests, so he's fine.

Anyone complaining now when they couldn't care less before are just whinging though.

 

[GIMH]

He has been proved wrong as no referee has called him for that. Yet repeating the same again and again is what gets the mods' goat.

That's funny, because every time a referee decides Stuart Broad has no case to answer, you have something to say. Not like you to have double standards hey

And again, I've not seen Brumby warned once, not saying he hasn't been but if you can show me somewhere he has been I'll accept it...

 

[Sir Alex]

That's funny, because every time a referee decides Stuart Broad has no case to answer, you have something to say. Not like you to have double standards hey

And again, I've not seen Brumby warned once, not saying he hasn't been but if you can show me somewhere he has been I'll accept it...

I served a ban for that FFS.

 

[slowfinger]

Brumby has complained about Ajmal even when England were winning the first 2 tests, so he's fine.

Anyone complaining now when they couldn't care less before are just whinging though.

Exactly. If the umpires seem happy then you are not welcome here.

 

[GIMH]

I served a ban for that FFS.

Haha, whatever. You've been banging on about Broad all year long, and you've been laughably banned for, what, seventeen days in total? Two weeks of that were for your posting in the WC forum IIRC

The pot has a message for you, Alex

 

[kingkallis]

If Murali was fine - Ajmal should be fine

Poms has the history of whining when the chips are down..

 

[taipan1]

If Murali was fine - Ajmal should be fine

Exactly, Murali was a chucker, Ajmal too.

 

[Jarquis]

If Murali was fine - Ajmal should be fine

How on this Earth does that work?

 

[Sir Alex]

Exactly, Murali was a chucker, Ajmal too.

Warne too chucked. Em' all chucked.

Except Sarwan

 

[taipan1]

Warne too chucked. Em' all chucked.

Very poor reasoning

 

[Spark]

Very poor reasoning

Which is kinda the point (but this is not the thread for this)

 

[BoyBrumby]

Sigh.

1 run added and double Nelson strikes. Ordinary shot from Broad, looked like he was determined to play a shot a ball. Which he did. To both of them.

147 the target then.