Not at all. Would have nothing if the batsmen had just left them.Decent start for Johnson then.
Did you watch at all? Constant wickets were falling and every time we tried to attack we failed. Pakistan dictated terms. At 3/40 and 6/160 we had to rebuild and ensure we weren't bundled out giving Pakistan all the time in the world to chase a lower score.australia scored at a slower rate in the 2nd ing, they should have attacked more. It is still their game to lose.
Reminds me of Thommo, never really sure which one would show upJohnson annoys the hell out of me, he can be deadly, can put batsmen in hospital and be unplayable, but then there are times when he can barely land the ball on the cutting strip, and was talk of him getting dropped from the team. I guess the true definition of a shock bowler.
Yeah, excellent explanation of why Johnson gets so many wickets with 'bad' balls.They were missing by quite a bit tbf- the commentators are making pretty good points now about how tight his angle is though.
A leftie swinging the ball away is far tougher to leave than people give Johnson credit for, though. So many times the ball looks right in the slot. Reckon Boycs would have played Johnson well. And given him some lip for bowling so wide.They were missing by quite a bit tbf- the commentators are making pretty good points now about how tight his angle is though.