• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

**Official** Pakistan in Australia Thread

Eclipse

International Debutant
Slow Love™ said:
Looks like it was at least partly about nursing Martyn to a century against a weakened attack (Martyn was on 60 or so when the 500 lead was passed). I hope we don't see many more situations as contrived as this in future, because that was lousy. Just my opinion - it certainly makes some of the comments Ponting and the Australians have made about other players in the past seem a little strange.

The exaggerated conservatism reminds me of Border, who was so over-cautious whenever his team got the upper hand. But at least he had a fairly ordinary bowling attack as an excuse.
I don't see how it does at all.. unless you seriously think Pakistan are going to hold on for a draw / win.
 

Slow Love™

International Captain
Eclipse said:
I don't see how it does at all.. unless you seriously think Pakistan are going to hold on for a draw / win.
No, I don't. And I know that the main defence of those comments was that it's a preference for individual milestones at the expense of a result. Nevertheless, how contrived this particular situation was bothers me, and does come off as extremely selfish and over-indulgent - whether it jeopardises the outcome of the match or not. Just because the other team is being slaughtered, doesn't mean we should be treated to such an exercise. We could close this game out, and should have, much earlier.

If I'd been in the crowd watching the game, I'd have been very disappointed. Maybe it's just me, but I prefer the "destroy the opposition as quickly as possible" approach if the game is that easy, rather than the "let's hand Marto a century and boost some averages completely unnecessarily when we already have a 500 lead" strategy. Might just be me, though.
 

Scallywag

Banned
Slow Love™ said:
No, I don't. And I know that the main defence of those comments was that it's a preference for individual milestones at the expense of a result. Nevertheless, how contrived this particular situation was bothers me, and does come off as extremely selfish and over-indulgent - whether it jeopardises the outcome of the match or not. Just because the other team is being slaughtered, doesn't mean we should be treated to such an exercise. We could close this game out, and should have, much earlier.

If I'd been in the crowd watching the game, I'd have been very disappointed. Maybe it's just me, but I prefer the "destroy the opposition as quickly as possible" approach if the game is that easy, rather than the "let's hand Marto a century and boost some averages completely unnecessarily when we already have a 500 lead" strategy. Might just be me, though.
Do you follow the cricket to find things to complain about. Poor you thought Ponting should have declared earlier, oh poor poor you.
 

Sehwag309

Banned
Slow Love™ said:
I wonder if Pakistan might find room for Yasir Hameed and Shoaib Malik for the next test.
They actually might, I thought kaneria was a gonner but he picked up those 2 wickets but Malik is a decent batter (or could be just against India factor)

But who u gonna drop? Farhat maybe

And not sure abt Aktars condition (Wouldn't that be a Huge Blow)
 

LongHopCassidy

International Captain
Actually, I think the selectors will stick with the current XI. Yasir is in questionable form and Malik is untested against Australia.

Any side that can get on top of Australia, even for one session, deserves credit.
 

Jono

Virat Kohli (c)
Slow Love™ said:
Yeah, but there's a bloody big difference between being penalized financially, and being called names like "unsportsmanlike". The latter partly goes with the territory of being number one (and the associated air of arrogance), but there's also the fact that some Australian players have transgressed more seriously than some players from other countries, without been fined (Brad Williams, who was all over Ganguly physically, and yelling right in players' faces is an excellent example - McGrath's blowup at Sarwan, while it had a context, was still remarkable for the fact that it wasn't properly actioned).

IMO, these new player conditions are BS, also. I enjoy seeing send-offs and one-upmanship, and I think most of us can all tell when these incidents cross the line. Akhtar yesterday most certainly didn't. Also, it seems like batsmen can get away with all measure of provocation, and bowlers are pounded upon once they retaliate (and in addition, it certainly does you no help to come from the subcontinent, in particular).

I also think the Aussies are a bit rich when they talk about "leaving these incidents on the field, where they belong", when guys like Martyn run to the umpire to complain at the slightest verbal challenge.

Bottom line though, is that we're in agreement that Shoaib's fine was absolute garbage.
Slow Love™ said:
This has nothing to do with anything though really. We need to get past these kind of cultural assumptions. It's like when people said Clive Lloyd couldn't be prejudiced against the Indian team because he was black. Which is not to say that he is prejudiced, but what a strange reason to hold up as evidence that he couldn't be!

And without wanting to politicize this thread too much, there's also situations like in the US, where black offenders claim to be brutalized by the NYPD, and the argument that one of the arresting officers was black makes their claims less believable somehow.

Sometimes, when there's a cultural bias in play (how often have we seen Australian players penalized for over-appealing? Didn't we see that when Warne was pushing for the record against Sri Lanka in Australia? What about slow Aussie over-rates???), it's not unusual for people from the same region to be part of the problem.

In addition, this is less important than what happens when somebody outside the subcontinent gets off for similar behaviour. This is not to insist that Madugalle is necessarily biased himself - maybe he's just being extra vigilant. But clearly, there's a pattern of inconsistency among the referees when it comes to some nations in the game.
Slow Love™ said:
From memory (from watching the great documentary, "Cricket in the 70's - The Chappell years"), Tony Greig did it to Dennis Lillee and Thommo, in Australia. It was very amusing.

IMO, that kind of display is good for the game. It's fun, and accentuates the personal battle between batsman and bowler. Same applies to Akhtar's hijinks, and people shouldn't fool themselves that Hayden isn't having words with Akhtar over the course of his innings. The authorities should leave this stuff alone, and only intervene when the behaviour goes beyond the pale.

I have similar attitudes to dissent. If a batsman refuses to leave the wicket when given out, or directs aggressive comments towards the umpire, by all means, they should be penalized/suspended. But if they're shaking their heads as they walk off, look surprised, or even if they throw something in the dressing room - I don't think we need formal penalties for that. The players are human beings.
Three absolutely excellent posts Slow Love. I agree with all of that. Williams has done far far worse. This demand for emotionless cricketers is garbage, and is ruining the game.

I also find it ironic that the batsman probably says far far more on many occasions, but that is ignored. Yet when the bowler finally gets the break through, he can't do anything. BS.
 

Eclipse

International Debutant
Slow Love™ said:
No, I don't. And I know that the main defence of those comments was that it's a preference for individual milestones at the expense of a result. Nevertheless, how contrived this particular situation was bothers me, and does come off as extremely selfish and over-indulgent - whether it jeopardises the outcome of the match or not. Just because the other team is being slaughtered, doesn't mean we should be treated to such an exercise. We could close this game out, and should have, much earlier.

If I'd been in the crowd watching the game, I'd have been very disappointed. Maybe it's just me, but I prefer the "destroy the opposition as quickly as possible" approach if the game is that easy, rather than the "let's hand Marto a century and boost some averages completely unnecessarily when we already have a 500 lead" strategy. Might just be me, though.
well thats fair enough I have no objections to any of that but it doesn't really have any relevance to the comments Ricky made about Lara.
 

Linda

International Vice-Captain
Mr Casson said:
Seeing Hayden shoulder arms today made me laugh until I thought "Blessing Mahwire".
Yes, and at least Hayden was done by a good ball (does Mahwire even have a good ball?).
 

wahindiawah

Banned
Pakistan's heroes would be shamed!

Pakistan's heroes would be shamed
By Peter Roebuck
December 18, 2004

Pakistan is supposed to be a proud cricketing nation. Ever since its creation as a sovereign state, it has held its own around the world. Indeed, it has known days of glory and produced many players whose efforts have been admired wherever the game is played. Fast bowlers have emerged from the hills of the Punjab, batsmen have come from the famous schools of Lahore, warriors have been found in the fiery city of Karachi, all-rounders have appeared in forsaken villages. A team chosen from Pakistan's cricketing history could compete with any side from anywhere.

Courage has been detected in its greatest players. Decades ago, a shrimp of a lad called Hanif Mohammad defied the West Indians for days till the match was saved. On a famous night in Melbourne, Imran Khan coaxed and goaded his side to a World Cup victory. Javed Miandad scored hundreds of runs and irritated opponents in about equal measure. Wasim Akram and Waqar Younis formed their region's most potent new-ball pairing since the days of Amar Singh and Mohammad Nasir. Superb spinners have been found, and staunch batsmen. Pakistani has been the strongest of the subcontinental countries.


AdvertisementNaturally, there have been defeats. Now and then, the team has lost its way as self-interest took men away from the path of service. At times, the reputation of the team has been imperilled. But the bad days were swiftly forgotten. Pakistan has been blessed with exceptional ability and always seemed able to fight back from every discouragement.

Not even Pakistan's most inglorious days, though, prepared spectators for the sights seen at the WACA Ground in Perth yesterday. Pakistan's performance was as spineless as it was embarrassing. Any relationship between its batting and Test match cricket was coincidental. Wickets were thrown away like confetti at a wedding as batsmen bereft of concentration and without application played shots - one can scarcely call them strokes - calculated to shame a schoolboy playing with his mates.

It was not even a fight. Playing for your country is supposed to bring out the best in a man.If Bob Woolmer did not feel like sending his players home after this abject display, then he counts among the most tolerant of men. If Inzamam-Ul-Haq did not read the riot act to his troops at stumps, then he is a weak leader. Not that his own display had much to commend it.

If Pakistan's opening bowlers were not discouraged by their batting colleagues, then they deserve to join the saints in their sanctuary. When their chance came, they fought with every power at their disposal.

Seldom in the annals of the game has a respected team offered as little resistance as did these visitors from Pakistan. A club team turning out on a Saturday afternoon would expect better of itself. A school side could not have fared much worse.

It was not entirely unexpected that inexperienced opening batsmen might be unable to withstand a potent attack armed with a new ball. Still, their dismissals were pretty feeble. No excuse can be found for productive middle-order batsmen prepared to swing their bats like medieval antagonists. Previously unsuccessful on this pitch, Shane Warne was presented with three wickets as Christmas gifts. As far as could be told from a distance, the leg spinner did not perform any particular miracles. None of his deliveries changed direction in midstream. None did a somersault. Tricks were not needed to remove these lacklustre opponents. No point wasting a bullet on a man intent upon suicide.

Warne must have laughed his way to the tally room. One opponent swiped across the line and was caught at deep mid-on. Another supposed batsman slogged and was clean bowled. Not long afterwards, a third member of the order, a left-hander who prefers bowling, lashed out recklessly. This was not resistance. This was surrender.

Meanwhile, Michael Kasprowicz was also enjoying himself. Well as the redoutable banana-bender bowled on a mild surface, he cannot have expected to encounter such timid batting.

At first, the crowd was pleased to see Pakistan falling apart. After a time, it fell silent. This was not Test match cricket. This was not a proud nation searching for the strength needed to subdue a powerful opponent. It was not even a fight. Playing for your country is supposed to bring out the best in a man.

Judging by their performance in the last session of the day, Shoaib Akhtar and Mohammad Sami were unimpressed with their colleagues. They put a price on their wickets and proved as hard to remove as a child's tooth. Their message was clear. Ashamed of the team's pathetic performance, the pace bowling pair set out to show that some of the tourists, anyhow, had the spirit needed to stand firm in the face of the antipodean onslaught.
 

wahindiawah

Banned
In another article Marc Waugh has compared Pakistan's batting with that of a school team. :p

Full credit though to Inzi's boys for lasting more than 3 days!
 

Swervy

International Captain
wahindiawah said:
Pakistan's heroes would be shamed
By Peter Roebuck
December 18, 2004

.
well Peter Roebuck has always been a nob of the highest order..Kaspa gets 5 for 30 and not a single word of praise.

Funny how Roebuck talks about school teams so much..I wonder why
 

Top