No I don't think so, but excessive bouncers are no balls so I think they were given that power accidentally.Wait, the umpires are allowed to check for excessive bouncers with the third umpire on wickets? Has that ever happened?
I think there was actually one in a very recent match - possibly one of the WI-England T20s?Wait, the umpires are allowed to check for excessive bouncers with the third umpire on wickets? Has that ever happened?
When they've tried that of late it's just turned the thing into the biggest pudding deck imaginable tbf, so I much prefer this.There's an article with the SCG groundsman talking about how he's hoping the pitch will take more turn.
Not sure anyone seems to remember that a big feature of the SCG's prior spin was the surface being bereft of grass - or certainly any live grass - which this isn't.
I thought the recent Sydney pitches tended to have a fair amount of dead grass rolled into the surface, which is a recipe for the aforementioned puddings.When they've tried that of late it's just turned the thing into the biggest pudding deck imaginable tbf, so I much prefer this.
Cummins is generally a more sensible reviewer than Paine or Smith, but I still think he gets more wrong than the average captain. Those two aren't the worst I've seen reviewed but neither really felt out either.Another poor review.
Surely he isn't silly enough to rely on the advice from Marnus, he thinks everything is out.Cummins is generally a more sensible reviewer than Paine or Smith, but I still think he gets more wrong than the average captain. Those two aren't the worst I've seen reviewed but neither really felt out either.
Seems like a solid crowd tbhNoticing that they're very cagey about the number of spectators actually at the ground.
I mean his style of appealing can be very persuasive.Surely he isn't silly enough to rely on the advice from Marnus, he thinks everything is out.
Also very knowledgeableSeems like a solid crowd tbh