• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

***Official*** Pakistan and England in UAE

Who do you think will win?!


  • Total voters
    88

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
Saw the last over yesterday. Never seen anyone hit 2 sixes in the last over before.
Has anyone else ever done it ?

How has Ajmal bowled ?

Any thoughts on his lack of success today ?
May it be that England has had a good look at him and have worked out a way to play him ?
He just hasn't bowled the right length.
 

Cevno

Hall of Fame Member
There is decent amount of nip for the seamers as Broad showed unfortuanttley the Pak seamers are no way near the class of Anderson & Broad..
There is decent amount of turn for the spinners too, even if slower than the previous ground. Plus with the square more abrasive there was some reverse for England too. Pakistan have been a bit off today and also a bit unlucky, and England have shown far far more application.

It's certainly not a road, imo. Even the scoring rate somewhat illustrates that.

That term is used too loosely these days.
 
Last edited:

Cevno

Hall of Fame Member
+ Hawkeye and other such instruments as admitted by manufacturers themselves isn't fully accurate.
 

hazsa19

International Regular
One of the more tentative drives you'll ever see Ian Bell hit for 4. Then he misses out on a full toss.
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
HawkEye's "Umpire's Call" parameters are waaaaaaaaaaay too conservative.
It's because people are paranoid. For whatever reason, people are far more comfortable with the idea of the standing umpire making an error than technology doing so, so we're stuck with a half-arsed version of the system to ensure nothing is even incorrectly over-turned - even if it means we get less decisions right overall.

Indeed, anti-technology types even manage to criticise UDRS for failing to correct poor decisions; never mind the fact that poor decisions were made in the first place or the fact that such an instance has no impact - be it positive or negative - on the game in comparison to what it'd be like without the system. Never mind that at all.
 

Top