tooextracool
International Coach
not a chance in hell.mikeW said:anybody else rekon Hodge should be in the team ahead of Katich?
not a chance in hell.mikeW said:anybody else rekon Hodge should be in the team ahead of Katich?
because andrew symonds and lehmann are anything other than rubbish bowlers?FaaipDeOiad said:Thommo is, frankly, a bit of an idiot. And I don't think he'll be making too many friends in the Australian camp blasting Andrew Symonds and Lehmann,
in all of 1 series. in the series at home against NZ and in the vb series he was fairly expensive, and his ER was 5.18 and 4.59 respectively.FaaipDeOiad said:He has both maintained a good economy rate AND got wickets in ODIs of late, which is a sign of quality bowling where just one or the other in limited overs games might not be.
I bet some sane New Zealanders would rather see Lee, as well as Lee's sponsors...tooextracool said:as would most sane people
I know eh? Australia seemed pretty confident in getting a wicket and wanted to get through the overs to keep the pressure on the batsmen who were well and truly on the defensive. Just goes to show that the over rate can be well above the required level if the bowling side actually want it to be. Warne only bowled 6 overs in it too, so most of the session was just quicks.marc71178 said:33 overs in a session?
What on Earth is going on!!!
Run rate is below 2, not much fielding going on.FaaipDeOiad said:I know eh? Australia seemed pretty confident in getting a wicket and wanted to get through the overs to keep the pressure on the batsmen who were well and truly on the defensive. Just goes to show that the over rate can be well above the required level if the bowling side actually want it to be. Warne only bowled 6 overs in it too, so most of the session was just quicks.
I agree that Kasper should be in there having bowled so well.Slow Love™ said:It's been quite bizarre to watch how certain people were that Lee had ALREADY been picked. IMO, the selectors did the logical thing, even if I wouldn't mind seeing Lee back in the test team at some stage. Kaspa deserves his place, and I think it's bad policy to throw out team members who are in good form.
I would make an exception for when a turning track necessitates picking two spinners.
Sure, in fact I think his selection is understandable anyway. The question is not really whether or not Kasper is a great bowler, it's whether or not the Australian bowling attack could be slightly better with Lee because his pace offers variety and penetration on those rare occasions when someone gets on top of McGrath, Gillespie and Kasprowicz, and I think the answer might be yes.Top_Cat said:And if they get bowled out cheaply, will you accept that Kasper's selection was vindicated?