cnerd123
likes this
7(-4)0m Latham is the best I can manage for himRaval getting out for 33 worked out so perfectly for you after your lame Willimas0n duck joke.
that or 3(-hree)0m Latham
7(-4)0m Latham is the best I can manage for himRaval getting out for 33 worked out so perfectly for you after your lame Willimas0n duck joke.
Nah, M17chell Santner IMO.Gonna be saved by Mitch311 Santner
DJ? A Killa? Done a Jaffa?The bowler with a very obvious potential nickname tearing through the hapless kiwis here
Haha I hadn't even noticed. I haven't been home for a week, finally back though, just in time for two Test matches - yay!PEWS has time for this silly nonsense but can't correct the typo in the thread title
WAC
Yeah so often under Stead and KW he's coming unstuck with all these timorous should I/shouldn't I vacillations in SC Tests, isn't he. A former rugby hooker and the son of Rod sort of trying to feign a bit more discernment and propriety than he really has in him. If we could bring back McCullum's working-class and less judgmental mood to the changing room, he'd probably be crushing sweeps off bang-in-front lines, getting away with all and back to his ton-scoring best.Latham would never throw away a start in a challenging setting
Just 'Killer' I reckon. Nice sound to itDJ? A Killa? Done a Jaffa?
Yeah agree. I'd probably take India's because I'm still kind of sceptical of Nicholls (and I also suspect that if Rahane continues to suck he'll be dropped for someone else who's decent), but the #5s all have a lot more question marks over them than the likes of Waugh, Laxman, Lehmann, de Villiers etc in previous eras of top teams.A question which started in cricinfo. Which combination will you take for your team?
Kane-Ross-Nicholls (or)
Pujara-Kohli-Rahane (or)
Khawaja-Smith-Head
The NZ pair looks the strongest. But in general, none of the middle orders in current era evoke the sense of awesomeness like Dravid-Sachin-Laxman or the middle orders of the old Aussie teams.