• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* New Zealand tour of India 2024

Nintendo

Cricketer Of The Year
This idea seems to have come up a lot in the last couple of years and I have never heard a remotely convincing reason as to why it is a) a good idea; or b) solves any team structure problem.
Yeah if there's any issue with this batting lineup (bar form fluctuations) it's that conway is opening when he's better as a #3/#4. Moving kane to 4 means he bats out of position, ravindra loses the #4 position he likes, and conway is still opening unless rachin opens?
 

Meridio

International Regular
Yeah if there's any issue with this batting lineup (bar form fluctuations) it's that conway is opening when he's better as a #3/#4. Moving kane to 4 means he bats out of position, ravindra loses the #4 position he likes, and conway is still opening unless rachin opens?
Exactly, it always come across as changing something for the sake of changing something
 

_Ed_

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Damn. That was a pretty valuable partnership, though. Just wish they could have kept it going a bit longer.
 

Meridio

International Regular
100, I think, is a defendable target on this if you bowl and catch really well. 150 I think is challenging, but that's a long way away yet. Especially with Blundell in now...
 

Top