Its a stroll in the park for the Kiwis !!Neil Pickup said:Towns - I turned your URL-link into an IMG-link so it's visible here. Now you get to explain what it means!
SJS said:Are you serious or are you.......
Some of India's finest cricketing feats have come against the Aussies. India play above themselves against the Australians and seem to sink to the depths against the Kiwis of late.
Hope it makes fans feel better.Sanz said:Relax everyone !! There is still lot of runs to be scored. Couple of wickets and we are back in the game.
I assure you, I would have scored 31 runs less than India's current captain.Jono said:Sehwag gets 2 wickets in one over. I wish Loony Bob was India's captain
To be fair to Ganguly though, our pace bowlers haven't helped him.
A little but NZ's batting line-up is very long. I hope we can snag a couple more before the 25th over.Sanz said:Hope it makes fans feel better.
Maybe we could have supersubbed you on or somethingLoony BoB said:I assure you, I would have scored 31 runs less than India's current captain.
They've dropped Zaheer and Balaji, so they were left with these three. If they can't look around, they can't find anyone, can they? Then again, they've opened with Nehra once more.To be fair to Ganguly though, our pace bowlers haven't helped him
I don't know, all 5 of them aren't special anyway. All we seem to do is rotate between the 5 of them, and play a young one in a meaningless match. But in the crunch games, 3 of the 5 are always chosen and most of the time they fail, no matter which 3 they are.Arjun said:They've dropped Zaheer and Balaji, so they were left with these three. If they can't look around, they can't find anyone, can they? Then again, they've opened with Nehra once more.
Could this be a strong case for Zaheer's recall?
One may really feel sorry for the Aussie pace bowler when he starts playing for India.Loony BoB said:It could be a strong case for paying an Australian pace bowler a few bucketloads to move to India for five or so years.
Zaheer may have had a bad series in SL, but on his day, he's a lot better than those other four. When he played his first ODI against the Aussies, he bowled a yorker that got Steve Waugh out, which announced his entry in international cricket. He's often bowled at a good pace (not quite the tearaway pace, but still reasonably fast by Indian standards) at his peak and yorkers at that pace can suddenly put the brakes on a batting side. He's also built like a fast bowler- unlike many Indian fast bowlers of the past and present, who were under-powered. However, he's been a little too insecure these days and looked tenative when he bowled. Once he gets some confidence back and regains his attacking intent, he can become a potent strike bowler for India. But Zaheer's case is yet again a case of good leaders and bad ones, since he has the potential to be a major wicket-taker.Jono said:I don't know, all 5 of them aren't special anyway. All we seem to do is rotate between the 5 of them, and play a young one in a meaningless match. But in the crunch games, 3 of the 5 are always chosen and most of the time they fail, no matter which 3 they are.
But if we're going to choose Pathan, Nehra and Agarkar... why the hell would we not open the bowling with Agarkar. The only asset he has is the ability to swing it a little. We may as well have Pathan and Agarkar make use of the new ball, and have Nehra bowl with the old one.