BoyBrumby
Englishman
Nah, Taylor.Just look at Vettori scrambling desperately for the last wicket to pad his figures. What an embarrassment. Is he still captaining?
Well, I say "captaining". Lot of motion going throughing on display.
Nah, Taylor.Just look at Vettori scrambling desperately for the last wicket to pad his figures. What an embarrassment. Is he still captaining?
Vettori hasn't been captain for bloody ages.Just look at Vettori scrambling desperately for the last wicket to pad his figures. What an embarrassment. Is he still captaining?
Rhetorical question, I know who our captain is ftrNah, Taylor.
Well, I say "captaining". Lot of motion going throughing on display.
wow, you too?Vettori hasn't been captain for bloody ages.
Did kinda wonder after I posted it, but I'm a credulous kinda ****.Rhetorical question, I know who our captain is ftr
Wouldn't have said anything, but you made a post not long ago which I let slide that seemed to be suggesting you thought Vettori would've been captain if he played in Hobart.wow, you too?
tbf POOS took it at face value as well, I guess there's no limit to how stupid people think I amDid kinda wonder after I posted it, but I'm a credulous kinda ****.
WI have a spinner in their team, thats where all the byes went.Kudos to Van Wyk, no byes in a total of 522 (Ramdin conceded 14, although I daresay he might have been unlucky as umpires give bowlers ridiculous leeway with short balls outside leg).
Drinks, but not for me - had more than enough last night.
Just for a change, Cricinfo rolling out the cliches.Cricinfo said:New Zealand don't have superstars. They have efficient Test players who perform specific roles that add up to pose a challenge to the opposition.
Yea but New Zealand have... err... Williamson.WI have a spinner in their team, thats where all the byes went.