Nnanden said:...what the? New Zealand crumble and the Saffies cruise along at 6-an-over? Pretty weird. Go Frankers.
alternative said:i can see kiwi's commin with an excuse like, we missin Shane Bond here..
South Africa will be disappointed with the last 20 minutes of today’s play but you have to think another 100 odd runs and this game could and should be out of the reach of the New Zealanders.alternative said:yep... anyway nz comming into the match now, with few quick wickets..
Martin and styris picking up wickets
But how would him have coming in at number 3 been any different to when he did come in today?Loony BoB said:marc - I don't think it would have changed anything about today - I haven't seen the dismissal but it looks to me like the SA bowling was just too good or the pitch was just too bad. Either that or it was a combined lack of effort from the entire NZ team outside of Fleming, which sadly wouldn't surprise me.
I think overall, though, Styris is more suited to that position.
The 50* on flatsville?NZTailender said:Yeah Styris was over 40. People seem to forget his 100 vs WI recently and 50* in the last test (at number 3!!).
I never said it would have. I just mean over his career, I feel he's more suited to the #3 position. We were talking about whether Styris should be in the squad, not how he batted today alone.marc71178 said:But how would him have coming in at number 3 been any different to when he did come in today?
Oh please. How much pressure was he under for that 50? Zilch. Nada. Nil.NZTailender said:Yeah Styris was over 40. People seem to forget his 100 vs WI recently and 50* in the last test (at number 3!!).
NZTailender said:lol, Martin. If he takes a 5-fer-not-many I will be both relieved yet annoyed, because it's Martin!
I still stand by Mills >> Martin btw.