He adds balance to the side with his batting and fielding.Great the geniuses who run NZ cricket are playing the 36 year old Chris Martin who hasnt had any impact in ages.
The more I think about this the better value it is. Ryder should be joint favourite with Taylor really, and he's not even shorter odds than Taylor when you combine him with Vettori, Hopkins, Patel and Williamson. Crazy odds. Loving it.Betfair paying 4.30 for 'any other batsman' to be NZ's highest run-scorer in the first innings. The batsmen they've quoted are McIntosh, Watling, Guptill, Taylor and McCullum. Guptill hilariously shorter priced than McIntosh and Watling despite not playing. But yeah, I'm on it - gooooo Ryder, Vettori, Williamson and Hopkins .. on Day 4.
Well I can't argue with that. It takes a BIG man to admit when he's wrong and you've proved me wrong sir. you have proved me wrong. And my apologies those who run NZ cricket for having that kind of foresight which us common folk do not have. That is why they get paid the big bucks. Martin must play. I can see clearly now.He adds balance to the side with his batting and fielding.
Indeed. His Test batting average of 2 clearly proves his status as an allrounder, and the 12 catches he's taken in 56 Test matches illustrate how important he is in the field.Well I can't argue with that. It takes a BIG man to admit when he's wrong and you've proved me wrong sir. you have proved me wrong. And my apologies those who run NZ cricket for having that kind of foresight which us common folk do not have. That is why they get paid the big bucks. Martin must play. I can see clearly now.
He adds balance to the side with his batting and fielding.
Taylor $4 and Vettori's $8, now, on bet365. I think I like my bet better.Vettori is $10 for bet365 Taylor is like less than $3
Wonder why Taylor went up, also an offchance that my NZD bets are different to your AUD ones.Taylor $4 and Vettori's $8, now, on bet365. I think I like my bet better.
To Jeets statistical defense he tends to only be bowled on flat lifeless wickets in Hamilton and Napier. He is a little better than his figures tend to suggest.
but seriously, why Patel? He has a career average of over 40 and it's not like he's a decent bat either
Nah it's not that because it just multiplies. It's not really $4 as such - it's just the way they show 3/1.Wonder why Taylor went up, also an offchance that my NZD bets are different to your AUD ones.