Good question though I don't know who on here might have actually seen Watling wicketkeep. In general though I think we should focus on a proven domestic performer like Van Wyk or Young, and McGlashan for limited overs.Wondering if anyone on CW can give me a grade on Watling's keeping from having watched him for any decent length of time? Is he a Sinclair-style obvious part-timer?
If he challenged McGlashan for the four-day gloves at ND this summer by saying "Guptill's 85's shafted me a little, Jamie How also in the wings and coming back into favour, I'm thinking about replacing ****kins to win my long-term test future" would it be crazy talk? Apart from the use of '****kins' in public I mean?
Yep.Crap, Guptill gone - I'm already thinking that 85 of his was a luck-inspired flash in the pan.
To be fair we had quite a few in Bangladesh - maybe that was our allotment for the year.We all know NZ are well overdue a catastrophic batting collapse. I'll actually be very impressed if we don't have one this match.
Surely not.Crap, Guptill gone - I'm already thinking that 85 of his was a luck-inspired flash in the pan.
Watling would have a scored a century then and probably another one today tooSurely not.
Haha, it's so infuriating for me, not rating either of them. If one fails it just means the other one plays.Watling would have a scored a century then and probably another one today too