Good question though I don't know who on here might have actually seen Watling wicketkeep. In general though I think we should focus on a proven domestic performer like Van Wyk or Young, and McGlashan for limited overs.Wondering if anyone on CW can give me a grade on Watling's keeping from having watched him for any decent length of time? Is he a Sinclair-style obvious part-timer?
If he challenged McGlashan for the four-day gloves at ND this summer by saying "Guptill's 85's shafted me a little, Jamie How also in the wings and coming back into favour, I'm thinking about replacing ****kins to win my long-term test future" would it be crazy talk? Apart from the use of '****kins' in public I mean?
Yep.Crap, Guptill gone - I'm already thinking that 85 of his was a luck-inspired flash in the pan.
To be fair we had quite a few in Bangladesh - maybe that was our allotment for the year.We all know NZ are well overdue a catastrophic batting collapse. I'll actually be very impressed if we don't have one this match.
Surely not.Crap, Guptill gone - I'm already thinking that 85 of his was a luck-inspired flash in the pan.
Watling would have a scored a century then and probably another one today tooSurely not.![]()
Haha, it's so infuriating for me, not rating either of them. If one fails it just means the other one plays.Watling would have a scored a century then and probably another one today too![]()