God, some of the posts in here about Flynn are absolutely horrible. The last thing I thought I'd be doing after the first Test was defending Flynn in the match thread; I thought it was ridiculous he was even in contention for selection, myself. However, while you can question his initial selection, his record and even his first innings knock, he played in a gem in the second dig, and I'm gobsmacked by some of the replies. Sure, he didn't score quickly, but
he was batting out a draw in a Test match FFS! Not to mention the fact that he was on Test debut and spent the entire innings batting with two of the most aggressive batsmen in Test cricket. He doesn't have to be your favourite player; you can most certainly dislike him as a cricketer if you wish - I certainly do (for different reasons), but you do have to appreciate that, from a cricketing perspective, he played perfectly and guided New Zealand to safety.
Isolator, I'd like you to meet Ashwell Prince.
Ashwell is a left handed middle order batsman. He leaves everything on a good length outside off and prides himself on an impecable back foot defense. He only has a couple of really productive scoring shots off the quicks - mostly driving off the back foot to the off side. Does that discription remind you of anyone? Well, Ashwell averages more in Test cricket than all but 5 batsmen in New Zealand's history. Of those five, only one of them have played in the last 12 years, and that was Mark Richardson - hardly the king of modern strokeplay himself.
I don't think Flynn will be a particularly successful Test batsman either, but it's not because of the stupid reasons people have crapped on with in here. He looked really good in the second dig IMO; good luck to him.