As it stands, I own a Bangladesh replica shirt, but that's as close as anyone comes!bashar said:Hello everyone
Just thought there was a distinct lack of Bangladesh fans around here ( or am i blind) and proceedings needed some spice.
Anyway, in the back of my wandering mind I feel, and is it a bad feeling, that Franklin and Wiseman will get a good haul. BAngladesh never gift their wickets Easily to the best of their opponents bowlers. Usually wickets are gifted to the lesser known bowlers so I see Vettori quite frustrated tomorrow.
Another Anyway: Watch out for Rafique. That's all for today. Hoping for a good day of cricket.
Welcome to the Forum Bashar.bashar said:Hello everyone
Just thought there was a distinct lack of Bangladesh fans around here ( or am i blind) and proceedings needed some spice.
Anyway, in the back of my wandering mind I feel, and is it a bad feeling, that Franklin and Wiseman will get a good haul. BAngladesh never gift their wickets Easily to the best of their opponents bowlers. Usually wickets are gifted to the lesser known bowlers so I see Vettori quite frustrated tomorrow.
Another Anyway: Watch out for Rafique. That's all for today. Hoping for a good day of cricket.
I note that they gave plenty of bowling to the part timers in the 'A' team in RSA - How, Sinclair & Vincent - a sign of looking for options perhaps, esp in light of Wiseman's performance thus far??????Mingster said:Anzac, I totally agree with that we need a part-time spinner somewhere in the team. Just as a variation perhaps. But the only batting allrounder in NZ who can bowl spin, is Rob Nicol, and he was in a bad patch of form last season. But if the batsmen can do their job, and same as the bowlers, there shouldn't be a need for batting allrounders. Rob Nicol is a great prospect for the future, had a great debut season, averaging over 50, and also took some wickets with his part-time offies.
and is the main reason why Fleming and the selectors are reluctant to pick him for the team, or bowl him when he is picked.bryce said:wiseman is one of the most predictable bowlers i have ever seen and looked more likely to get hit out of the park than get a wicket, that is probaly the slowest pitch i have ever seen....
You'd have been better off picking another bat, and using Rigger as your second spinner!shaka said:and is the main reason why Fleming and the selectors are reluctant to pick him for the team, or bowl him when he is picked.
exactlyNeil Pickup said:You'd have been better off picking another bat, and using Rigger as your second spinner!
I agree, Riggor needs to be used more as a second spin option, he used to be a bowler only, so that must give him advantages as a part timer.Neil Pickup said:You'd have been better off picking another bat, and using Rigger as your second spinner!
I agree about that, and btw Boston leading game 6Kent said:I know I've posted around 20 times about this series so I am interested in it, but I haven't watched a ball yet!
As a casual baseball follower with laughable ties to the Red Sox (it was my school socks when I used to come home and hit the couch!), I certainly don't expect anyone to fight me for the remote until NZ are at least batting.
160 wickets in tests is not average dude, although his bowling average aint that bad at 38 odd. It used to be a lot more than that.Macka said:Yawn, good come back by Bangladesh. I hope Rafique bowls well and shows up Vettori for the extremely average bowler he is.