sportychic33
State 12th Man
does anyone know whats the score in the black caps warm up match against the BCB XI?
I don't think his final test in England was that bad! It was a bit of an easy-paced pitch and a dead rubber I suppose.Mingster said:Styris had an awful England series, but if you look back over his past 5-10 matches, his form has been pretty consistent.
I say it a lot, but google news really is fantastic!sportychic33 said:does anyone know whats the score in the black caps warm up match against the BCB XI?
Mate, your a ****in clown and mustn't be a very good reader either because if you bothered to READ the post properly you would of seen me say that they(hamilton & hefford) should of been ahead of sherlock purely because they are the people who kept him out of the CD team - not that they should of been on the tour, and again if you bothered to READ my post i actually suggested mark gillespie or bradley scott ahead of sherlock for the tour and they are both good young players who had very good seasons who i also felt should have been rewarded, don't bother to reply to posts you don't read properly in the future or your going to make yourself look like an even bigger idiot.Mingster said:What a joke you are. You make Anzac look too good (Anzac mate, your posts have been great recently ).
Lance Hamilton? The purpose of the NZ 'A' tour, was partly to develop up and coming players, and Hamilton does not fit the criteria I'm afraid. He is 31, nearing 32 next year, and will struggle to make a full-strength CD attack.
Hefford' statistics are nothing to proud of, especially an average of 30 in NZ seaming conditions. Sherlock was picked on potential, and has delivered in parts of the tour.
Sherlock was injured - Hamilton and Hefford weren't "selected ahead of him".bryce said:Mate, your a ****in clown and mustn't be a very good reader either because if you bothered to READ the post properly you would of seen me say that they(hamilton & hefford) should of been ahead of sherlock purely because they are the people who kept him out of the CD team - not that they should of been on the tour, and again if you bothered to READ my post i actually suggested mark gillespie or bradley scott ahead of sherlock for the tour and they are both good young players who had very good seasons who i also felt should have been rewarded, don't bother to reply to posts you don't read properly in the future or your going to make yourself look like an even bigger idiot.
Kent said:so I'd say Tuesday's XI is pretty much set.
yeah i suppose but what are oram and tuffey then - 125km bowlers who spearhead our attack, mark gillespie would of been a good pick though because he is also a good lower order batsman and as said in earlier posts i don't know how accurate cricinfo's RF,RM, etc etc, but it has gillespie down as a RFM but i'm not too sure, does anyone know how quick he bowls?Mingster said:Brad Scott is nothing special, typical NZ medium pacer who only relies on seaming conditions to do well.
Well, I'm assuming Bracewell's already made up his mind on the Marshall/Astle situation. Personally I think he's had a strong leaning towards Marshall before this match even began.bryce said:yeah just the small matter of dropping the 12th player