Haha, wow. Each to their own then.The lack of wickets is a huge issue for pressing Test claims, tbh. No matter how economically he's bowled.
Now that they have run out of top batters, might as well go down swinging.ffs, Mills and Guptill still batting in exactly the same way!
Mills makes me very nervous against such a new ball
Atleast this idiot MIlls can rotate strike, instead of ending up 5 from 20 and top edging one.Now that they have run out of top batters, might as well go down swinging.
Yeah.So can Diamanti bat?
Five and a half per over for the next 5 without losing a wicket and NZ still well in it. And Nath I know he's a good bowler mate it just ****s me when it goes wrong in a game like this.We shouldn't let Southee or Mills come in too early, they're actually quite underrated hitters and we'll probably be thinking "tail" instead of "danger".
The Aussies have been spanked all season because of their inability to take wickets against the Saffies. It ain't exactly a genius conclusion to come to that picking a guy not taking wickets at the top level wouldn't be a great idea. Don't see the problem and that he's barely been mentioned as a serious Test prospect says something. And before you say it, I highly doubt it's because of his bowling against India 4 years ago.Haha, wow. Each to their own then.
Mark Nicholas?Think Ricky Ponting is amazing tbh, as a player and a leader. That run out was sublime.
wow, stupidNow that they have run out of top batters, might as well go down swinging.
It's a discussion. There's no winner/loser.Nnanden wins the argument tbh imo