The trial of Williamson up the order seems to be failing. Give him a few more though.I'm surprised that:
- He was the 5th change
- He got a stumping
The pace that he was bowling at in the FC game I wouldn't think a keeper would stand up to that tbh. Maybe he's slowed it down a bit for this game.
Anyhow good bowling and woeful batting, wouldn't be surprised to see Williamson get the axe tbh (Which would be stupid IMO but...)
Well tbf it's only his second game batting at three. Probably wasn't best to shove him up the order when he was struggling at five.The trial of Williamson up the order seems to be failing. Give him a few more though.
Wasn't he an opener at youth level? Or am I confusing him with some other youngster, maybe Broom or Hay? I'm sure someone was.Well tbf it's only his second game batting at three. Probably wasn't best to shove him up the order when he was struggling at five.
Best thing for his future imo however. He's always been a number three so it's probably best he stays there now.
Nope. He's always been a number three from quite early on in his career. He debuted for New Zealand under 19's at three and played most of his cricket for them at three (he opened and you were right about this for them in the 2008 world cup but that's because they lost Raval I think.)Wasn't he an opener at youth level? Or am I confusing him with some other youngster, maybe Broom or Hay? I'm sure someone was.
I think it would be safe to say we can write down forum favourite Jimmy Neesham for the national squad. While from an Otago point of view Blair Soper has been bowling quite well and Michael Bracewell has been consistently getting starts but only has one fifty. I still think that these two will be our two reps for the NZ team.Auckland’s Jimmy Neesham staked his claim for a place in the national Under 19 World Cup squad with an unbeaten 116 today – his second century in three days – as his side despatched Wellington in round three of the National Under 19 competition.
Auckland restricted Wellington to 168 for nine in their 50 overs, Tom Blundell top scoring with 56. Auckland made short work of the run chase, reaching the target in the 27th over and losing only one wicket. Neesham was well supported by Michael Barry on 37 not out.
Canterbury remain at the top of the table, just one point clear of Auckland, after taking maximum points in defeating Otago. Canterbury were dismissed on the last ball of their 50 overs having compiled 242, Tom Latham again top scoring with 77. For Otago Blair Soper took five for 48. Otago were unable to challenge the required total, all out in the 45th over for 180.
Central Districts and Northern Districts fought a close tussle, with Northern finishing just seven runs short of Central’s 216. For Central, captain Ben Smith scored 71 and Roald Badenhorst 56. Northern could only reach 209 before running out of overs with two wickets still in hand. Rory Darkins and Scott Kuggelelijn both went close to half centuries.
Canterbury and Auckland are now well ahead of the other four provinces with two rounds of play remaining before the finals. Central overtake Otago to move into third place.
Scorecards:
Central Districts 216 (B Smith 71, R Badenhorst 56; J Walker 4-28, M Thomas 3-28) defeated Northern Districts 209/8(R Darkins 49no, S Kuggeleijn 48, P Boocock 30; R Badenhorst 3/25, B Wheeler 3/31) by 7 runs.
Wellington 168/9 (T Blundell 56; J Drinkall 3/37) lost to Auckland 172/1 in 26.2 overs (J Neesham 116no, M Barry 37*) by nine wickets.
Canterbury 242 49.5 overs (T Latham 77, H Nicholls 63; B Soper 5/48) defeated Otago 180 44.4 overs (M Bracewell 54, D Power 39) by 62 runs.
Points Table (end of Round 3)
Canterbury - 15
Auckland - 14
Central Districts - 7.5
Otago - 4
Wellington - 0
Northern Districts - 0
* CD were penalised for a slow over rate on Day 1.
Download the day three short scorecards and full points table »
Friday 18 December is a rest day
Draw for Round 4, Saturday 19 December:
All games at Te Atatu Park, Auckland
Auckland v Otago
Wellington v Northern Districts
Central Districts v Canterbury
Noooooo!OoooooooOoooo!oThat Chap Above said:S Kuggeleijn
Would you know why James Marshall batted at number ten for ND during their chase?Just come back from Seddon Park and I must say I was pretty impressed with Stewart. I've mentioned him on here a few times as a possible 6-7 for New Zealand but he was brillant today. He started of with a SR of around 80ish and kept it there until he was on around 40-50 and then he just started teeing off, he hit some massive sixes out of the six he hit.
He picked up a hand injury when ND were in the field.Would you know why James Marshall batted at number ten for ND during their chase?