HeathDavisSpeed
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
I see NZC have felt the need to clarify the use of the 3rd umpire
Still think this is bollocks. What if the replay had shown the ball was clearly missing, yet the umpire's basically said "I think its out, I'm just not sure if he's hit it". I thought it was a poor call myself when the umpire hadn't given Pollard out. If he'd given Pollard out, and then gone to the replay to clarify whether he'd hit it, I think it wouldn't have looked so poor. However, it just looked as if the umpire didn't have a clue and referred it once the Aucklanders had a semi-appeal over it. If that's the rule, I think it needs changing.
Still think this is bollocks. What if the replay had shown the ball was clearly missing, yet the umpire's basically said "I think its out, I'm just not sure if he's hit it". I thought it was a poor call myself when the umpire hadn't given Pollard out. If he'd given Pollard out, and then gone to the replay to clarify whether he'd hit it, I think it wouldn't have looked so poor. However, it just looked as if the umpire didn't have a clue and referred it once the Aucklanders had a semi-appeal over it. If that's the rule, I think it needs changing.