Mingster said:It's not that **** aside from apart from the selection of Matthew Bell aside.
Lineup in batting order:
M Bell
J How
P Fulton
M Sinclair
H Marshall
L Vincent
J Franklin
K Mills
R Hart +
B Martin
I Butler
How and Fulton are great up and coming talents and deserve their selections, Sinclair has gotten in there because of the high amount of runs he has scored in this domestic season, while Marshall has been given a punt based on his ODI success lately. The selection of Vincent shows that the selectors have finally put him in his rightful position, in the middle-order. Franklin was the top wicket-taker in the State Championship and has been wonderful with the bat as well. Mills is a decent option in first-class cricket, he has the ability to swing the ball and has a batting average of 43. Bruce Martin has also been brilliant with the ball, somewhat the forgotten man of NZ Cricket.
Tim said:Is this 16 for the tests? I think it would have to be:
Fleming
Richardson
Papps
Styris
McMillan
Astle
Vettori
Cairns
Oram
McCullum
Bond
Tuffey
Mason
Butler
B.Martin
Sinclair
The only problem I see there, is that there are no backup openers...but I guess they could use Fleming, Astle, Sinclair or McCullum if required.
Im absolutely sure Bracewell will continue to pick 2 spinners in his squad, and I think it's time Bruce Martin had another crack.
There is 1 specialist keeper (McCullum) & then Papps or Sinclair who could take the gloves..so that base is covered.
McMillan is really the only batsmen there i'm still concerned with (at this stage) & perhaps if he fails everytime against South Africa..NZ may opt for Peter Fulton or Lou Vincent. But at this stage i'm still picking McMillan to go to England.
I still reckon though that Franklin could be the surprise pick, he offers some variety with his left arm & there's no doubt that he's improved with the bat. Kyle Mills might be able to sneak in, but Franklin probably has the edge.
Mason is not a OD specialist, his FC stats prove it and he was first selected as the 12th man for Test matches. Mills does not have good FC bowling stats, average of 30 is hardly convincing when Mason's is well under 25.anzac said:I'd rather have thought that Mills would be ahead of Mason so far as selection for the Test squad - as I said earlier Mason seems to be more of a OD 'specialist' whereas Mills is an established ODI squad member and has good FC stats..........
Both Mills & Franklin need to play in the 'A' series to have any chance...............
B Martin needs to show that he has good wicket taking ability to get the nod ahead of Wiseman.................
I agree re McMillan & I'd go so far that on current season I'd rather have Sinclair batting at No4 with Styris at 5..............
but hey, that's just me - my starting lineup would look something like this (all things being equal)..........
Richardson / Papps / Fleming / Sinclair / Astle / Styris / Oram / McCullum / Vettori / Tuffey / Bond
8D
I know what you and I said.Mingster said:Craig, in your previous post, you just said Martin can bat. :rolleyes:
Mingster said:Mason is not a OD specialist, his FC stats prove it and he was first selected as the 12th man for Test matches. Mills does not have good FC bowling stats, average of 30 is hardly convincing when Mason's is well under 25.
Mills isn't an established ODI member, his bowling was complete utter trash in the summer and I doubt he will overtake Mason who has emerged as a good foil to Tuffey.
Franklin and Mills are in the NZ 'A' squad. But I personally hope Franklin gets a few more chances.
Tim said:Martin is more low 140's.
Mason has done well in this year's State Championship, check again mate. I think he also has an average around the high 10's. Pretty good going.anzac said:was not aware he had been in a Test squad b4 - only knew he had been a ODI squad member about the time of the WC........whereas Mills has been in the ODI squad for several seasons & was usually the first replacement seamer used.....
had not found any stats for Mason bowling this season in the Championship so had no current 'form' in the longer game........whereas Mills took 13 @ just over 17..........
I have been calling for Franklin to be given a go for some time now - from memory it was one such post that may have even led to us first crossing swords............
stats aside how does the bowling compare amongst the contenders??? I only have recent commentary to go by....
Mills - RFM swing at about mid 130 ks
Mason - RFM low / mid 130s
Franklin - LFM swing??? low 130s
C Martin RFM swing??? mid 130s
I also see Franklin's bowling partner Gillespie was amongst the wickets - what's he like - another leftie??????
![]()