-
Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
**Official** NatWest Challenge Thread
- Thread starter Andre
- Start date
superkingdave
Hall of Fame Member
A wides a wide doest matter what happens after it.steds said:
biased indian
International Coach
steds said:
Langeveldt
Soutie
Nah..
Mind you I am of the school of thought that nowadays all keepers should be excellent batsmen as well...
I've only seen one innings, admittedly, but it doesnt bode that well....
Mind you I am of the school of thought that nowadays all keepers should be excellent batsmen as well...
I've only seen one innings, admittedly, but it doesnt bode that well....
steds
Hall of Fame Member
From the MCC code of laws 2003:superkingdave said:
Law 39 STUMPED
1) Out Stumped
a)The striker is out stumped if
(i) He is out of his ground
and(ii)he is receiving a ball which is not a No Ball
and(iii)he is not attempting a run
and(iv)his wicket is fairly put down by the wicket-keeper without the intervention of another member of the fielding side
b)The striker is out stumped if all the conditions of (a) above are satisfied...
...Which they were, therefore Vaughan is out
Last edited:
superkingdave
Hall of Fame Member
steds said:
Yeah i think you have missed the point, I'm not arguing whether he should be out or not, but the fact that the ball should have been called a wide as it was far out side leg stump - therefore there should have been another ball.
superkingdave
Hall of Fame Member
What about the drop off Vaughan? game could have been over well before it got close if he'd taken that.steds said:
Langeveldt
Soutie
Looked like a good keeper.. I was impressed with the quick effort he and Kaif did to get rid of Collingwood.. Apparently the whole play took less than a second...
superkingdave
Hall of Fame Member
I actually thought he was perilously close to knocking the bails off before the ball was in his glove, but i agree it was a great piece of workLangeveldt said:
Langeveldt
Soutie
marc71178 said:
Noo, Marc, you are getting him mixed up with Deep Dasgupta, Vijay Dahiya, Ajay Ratra AND Parthiv Patel!
lord_of_darkness
Cricket Web XI Moderator
looks like hes patels elder brother..
SpaceMonkey
International Debutant
please someone tell me WHY McGrath is still in the England team? He didnt bowl today which shows the faith they have in his bowling and yet again he failed with the bat. The sooner Pieterson is avaliable and replaces him the better!
The much maligned Indian bowlers come up with the goods ! Amazing !
It was refreshing to see Karthik get a go -- I hope he gets more chances in the upcoming Champions trophy.
Good captain's knock from Ganguly -- hopefully the win will give his team much needed confidence.
Excellent bowling from Harmison & co -- a pity the batting didn't quite match it.
It was refreshing to see Karthik get a go -- I hope he gets more chances in the upcoming Champions trophy.
Good captain's knock from Ganguly -- hopefully the win will give his team much needed confidence.
Excellent bowling from Harmison & co -- a pity the batting didn't quite match it.