It's a lottery after the semis unless one of the sides is twice as good as the others(like Australia were in 2003). Don't think it really matters.So I'm glad we will finish third (or second) and not fourth. Not that we will start favourites against SA, but it's the matchup you would rather have.
While catches can be dropped even by India, Indians would never give freebies like Afghanistan did. He has been cramping up since he was on 130 and you are feeding balls where he doesn't have to move his feet.Well I put $20 on them at 12-1 but didn’t think for a second I’d win.
An innings like this from Maxwell is the type of innings someone needs to play to take India down this WC.
I agree. Do they have a bowling coach? Maxi might have still deposited a few if they would've bowled a bit wider but at least there was a chance to get him out.With him cramping up you are giving them balls in his arc .. let me fetch make him move his feet. That period was worse than mujeeb dropping a sitter
And that gives you the best chance of making the finals, because India is not choking like Afghanistan or SA. Not this year!So I'm glad we will finish third (or second) and not fourth. Not that we will start favourites against SA, but it's the matchup you would rather have.
Wouldn't discredit Maxi's innings though. He is capable of pulling off such freakish stuff no matter what type of bowling he faces.While catches can be dropped even by India, Indians would never give freebies like Afghanistan did. He has been cramping up since he was on 130 and you are feeding balls where he doesn't have to move his feet.
Do you think India will feed him. They will bowl Yorkers on 5th stump line not length ball on stumps.
Great, unless they are bilaterals. We need to bring back triangular series' if we are not having ODIs just as ICC events.In other news...how good are ODIs.
Even he admitted that he rode his luck multiple times this innings, it wasn't a fluent/chance less innings.Wouldn't discredit Maxi's innings though coz the opposition bowled badly. He is capable of pulling off such freakish stuff no matter what type of bowling he faces.
And 24. The 24 wasn't straight forward, but **** me the 33 was.Worth remembering Maxwell was dropped on 33.
Shows the value of having a top class fast bowler, Afghanistan are missing that..And 24. The 24 wasn't straight forward, but **** me the 33 was.
Just watched highlights, that is a bone-headed effort with the ball by Afghanistan. The guy is on one leg, can't shift his weight, and they seemed to bowl in the only place he could get any leverage to hit boundaries with, ie straight on a length. Why wouldn't you bowl a foot wide of off stump and make him move?
I think the players didn't react well to pressure. But there should've been someone from the coaching staff to point out that. It was a very straightforward thing.And 24. The 24 wasn't straight forward, but **** me the 33 was.
Just watched highlights, that is a bone-headed effort with the ball by Afghanistan. The guy is on one leg, can't shift his weight, and they seemed to bowl in the only place he could get any leverage to hit boundaries with, ie straight on a length. Why wouldn't you bowl a foot wide of off stump and make him move?
It seemed to show the lack of cricketing nous. I dunno exactly the point where Maxwell's legs seized up, but at that point you forget that the stumps even exist. Set men back on the off side, bowl length a foot outside off and see how freakish he is in getting those wrists to hit boundaries...or force him to run. And get Cummins on strike.Shows the value of having a top class fast bowler, Afghanistan are missing that..
Maxwell isn't the sort of guy you want coming in now.
Lol for the wrong reasonsWatch out for the much vaunted spin attack they said!
Arguably. Up there with KOB and Kapil knocks.Is the greatest group stage innings ever played in WC history?