• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

***Official***Match #35 - New Zealand vs Pakistan - November 4th - Bengaluru

A

Andyhere

International 12th Man
trundler said:
I mean, 9 wickets in hand with half the score done in 25 overs is always in favour of the batting side unless you want to introduce a variable measuring tendency to collapse?
Click to expand...
Collapse was inevitable with Pakistan. They got lucky because of the rain. If this was a full game, no way they were winning this. This is the team that went from 155/2 to 191 all out not that long ago.
 
L

loterry1994

International Debutant
trundler said:
I mean, 9 wickets in hand with half the score done in 25 overs is always in favour of the batting side unless you want to introduce a variable measuring tendency to collapse?
Click to expand...
in my opinion it just favours the team chasing most the time or if it rains out fully and one team posts a massive score then doesn’t get a chance to bowl you still have to split the points. 25 overs left and still chasing around 8 an over is tough. But it is what it is I guess.
 
trundler

trundler

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Andyhere said:
Collapse was inevitable with Pakistan. They got lucky because of the rain. If this was a full game, no way they were winning this. This is the team that went from 155/2 to 191 all out not that long ago.
Click to expand...
Against India. This is NZ. Opposite dynamics between the sides. They had proper batsmen until 7 and a useful tail today. At the point in the game when rain halted play, Pakistan were well ahead though you could expect anything afterwards.
 
N

number11

State Regular
What would have happened is of course speculative.
At the bell, Pakistan were ahead and I can't believe they pulled this off. I missed all of the game, but this smacks of classic Pakistan.
If Lanka bt NZ, and Pk beat Eng - Pak may go through?
 
Silver Silva

Silver Silva

International Regular
trundler said:
Against India. This is NZ. Opposite dynamics between the sides. They had proper batsmen until 7 and a useful tail today. At the point in the game when rain halted play, Pakistan were well ahead though you could expect anything afterwards.
Click to expand...
And let's give Fakhar Zaman some credit also. That was the best knock of the tournament..This victory is only possible because of that knock.
 
trundler

trundler

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Silver Silva said:
And let's give Fakhar Zaman some credit also. That was the best knock of the tournament..This victory is only possible because of that knock.
Click to expand...
Yeah, that's why Pak were ahead in the game. I meant DLS or any attempt to produce a result in rain-affected matches should obviously measure what happened until the interruption and go off of that and not what could or should happen. Otherwise, just take the win predictor reading before the match and just give it to the team that should win.
 
King Kane

King Kane

International Regular
Silver Silva said:
And let's give Fakhar Zaman some credit also. That was the best knock of the tournament..This victory is only possible because of that knock.
Click to expand...
Yeah that was an incredible knock from him, won them the game, hard to believe that Pakistan picked Imam ul Haq ahead of him until the last 2 games.

If Imam ul Haq played instead of Fakhar we would have won that game easily.
 
Adorable Asshole

Adorable Asshole

International Regular
King Kane said:
Yeah that was an incredible knock from him, won them the game, hard to believe that Pakistan picked Imam ul Haq ahead of him until the last 2 games.

If Imam ul Haq played instead of Fakhar we would have won that game easily.
Click to expand...
Imam is Inzy nephew and a close friend of Babar.
 
srbhkshk

srbhkshk

International Captain
trundler said:
Yeah, that's why Pak were ahead in the game. I meant DLS or any attempt to produce a result in rain-affected matches should obviously measure what happened until the interruption and go off of that and not what could or should happen. Otherwise, just take the win predictor reading before the match and just give it to the team that should win.
Click to expand...
People like cribbing about DLS, but the numbers they pull from their ass are generally far worse. It's a fine system and the correct result was produced today as far as the actual cricket that happened is concerned.
 
Nintendo

Nintendo

Cricketer Of The Year
Why does everyone hate iman, lol. Averages 48 @82 in ODI's, he's a fine batsmen and plenty of teams would love to have him. Pakistan just have other top order options.
 
jcas0167

jcas0167

International Regular
Days of Grace said:
I just can’t believe this. World Cup has gone from bad to worse. Maybe we were right to bowl first every time. No way can this bowling attack defend anything.
Click to expand...
Really appreciate how important Henry has become to this side. Presumably Jamieson will play the next game. Someone above mentioned Sodhi didn't have a great record against Pakistan so would have been interesting to hear the selection discussion.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Top