I think the standards are slightly different for fast bowlers, other bowlers and batsmen. Or at least between fast bowlers and others. Also, the fitness requirements for LO cricket is different to test cricket. It all makes sense but I feel at the least at the beginning of such initiatives, more leeway should be given to the players. Fitness is not achieved overnight. It is a process.So apparently all Indian players have to pass the same fitness tests, regardless of playing role
Why a spinner needs to be as fit as a fast bowler is beyond me. Surely all that matters is wickets, runs and not being a liability on the field.
But these are new standards and they need the Indian physio + group to monitor, I guess. Same thing happened when the Yo-Yo test was first introduced.They shouldn't be picking the players in the squad if they're not fit enough to begin with. Sends mixed messages.
Yep, different standards.I think the standards are slightly different for fast bowlers, other bowlers and batsmen.
Not necessarily a walk in the park but something it should be very easy to train with the most minimal of routine (e.g., one 2km run per week as a pre-gym warm-up). Perhaps it is a good indicator if someone is hiding an injury of sorts.Yep, different standards.
This was from about a month ago
"Among these tests was the now famous yo-yo test and the new ‘2km run’ fitness test. In this test, a batsman, wicketkeeper or a spinner has to complete the two-kilometer distance in eight minutes and 30 seconds, while for a fast bowler, the benchmark is eight minutes and 15 seconds. Six of the players failed to clear these tests. Some players barely managed to complete the run."
2km in 8:30 should really be a walk in the park for a professional athlete. The fact that some barely managed to complete the run is ****ing embarrassing.
Shame about Varun, it seems that he could be a successful limited overs bowler given all the variations and that he's proven himself against international strength batsmen.So apparently Varun and Tewatia failed the fitness tests and will not be picked at least for the first game. And Natarajan is still recovering from some kind of injury and has not even made it to Ahmedabad yet. Guess this will be the side now.
yah Definitely,Pandya is a strange selection call. He hasn't bowled in red ball cricket since....I don't remember. His bowling is surplus to requirement in these conditions and India are rarely desperate to firm up their batting at home grounds.
Just don't see him featuring at all in this series.
Is the bar seriously that low? That's extraordinary.Yep, different standards.
This was from about a month ago
"Among these tests was the now famous yo-yo test and the new ‘2km run’ fitness test. In this test, a batsman, wicketkeeper or a spinner has to complete the two-kilometer distance in eight minutes and 30 seconds, while for a fast bowler, the benchmark is eight minutes and 15 seconds. Six of the players failed to clear these tests. Some players barely managed to complete the run."
2km in 8:30 should really be a walk in the park for a professional athlete. The fact that some barely managed to complete the run is ****ing embarrassing.
It makes sense to lift them up slowly than suddenly.Is the bar seriously that low? That's extraordinary.
I think it's a good indicator of baseline level of aerobic fitness required for a format which prizes athleticism. Like it's not level 15 beep test here.Not necessarily a walk in the park but something it should be very easy to train with the most minimal of routine (e.g., one 2km run per week as a pre-gym warm-up). Perhaps it is a good indicator if someone is hiding an injury of sorts.
I do question the relevance of distance running (rather than sprints, match practice, nets, etc) for international cricket fitness but I'm no expert (or even amateur) at such matters.
Oh I'm not questioning why it's so low; given that even such a level is a bar too high for six (!!!) professional sportsmen seeking to represent their country, clearly they can't justify pushing it any higher.It makes sense to lift them up slowly than suddenly.
T20 series as whole may be doesT20Is don't deserve their own thread tbh
15km for a T20 iirc? Might be way off the mark here.I can't remember what the actual GPS data collected suggests, but I'm pretty sure that if you can't even manage a 2km run then you're going to struggle to keep full physical intensity throughout a whole T20. It's not like it's only your fielding that will suffer if you're dog tired just from having to run around in the field.
thread is up http://www.cricketweb.net/forum/thr...-t20-international-series-in-ahmedabad.84426/T20 series as whole may be does