-
Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
**Official** India v Pakistan
- Thread starter dudeurfriend
- Start date
Deja moo
International Captain
www.cricbuzz.com is good too and auto refreshes itself.SJS said:
vandemataram
Banned
marc71178 said:
verconfidence.....L 
L
vandemataram
Banned
twctopcat said:
The bowlers (if we can call them one) happen to be the best in the entire country
vandemataram
Banned
tooextracool said:
Garbage...
well thats perhaps too harsh.I would actually like them to play against our club teams to see if they have any potential.
So where are Akhtar's critics now??? Where are those dumb people who were all saying Akhtar Pakistan team would perform better without Akhtar??? Where are the fans of mighty Rana Naveed now?
I'm not Saying that had Akhtar playing this match the situation would have been much different, but one can't deny the fact that he's a wicket taking bowler and he's certainly better then the likes of Sami,Razzak,Rana who are all rubbish.
The biggest idiot is Bob Woolmer who was actually convinced that without Akhtar Pakistan would actually beat India as he thought Rana and Sami would actually trouble India.
I bet Akhtar would be laughing, not on Pak team, but on cluless and helpless Mr Inzi!
I'm not Saying that had Akhtar playing this match the situation would have been much different, but one can't deny the fact that he's a wicket taking bowler and he's certainly better then the likes of Sami,Razzak,Rana who are all rubbish.
The biggest idiot is Bob Woolmer who was actually convinced that without Akhtar Pakistan would actually beat India as he thought Rana and Sami would actually trouble India.
I bet Akhtar would be laughing, not on Pak team, but on cluless and helpless Mr Inzi!
tooextracool
International Coach
well sehwag has a real chance of surpassing his 309 against this bowling attack.....
I think the Pak selection committee made a big blunder by selecting just three pacers (one in Khaleel whome they have no faith ) for Indian tour. Surely Pakistan must have better pacers playing at domestic level. Shahid Nazeer happen to be in good form and is experiance too, he should have been choosen for this tour.
I beleive it was Inzi and Bob that wanted Khaleel in the party instead of Shahid Nazeer, the explaination given by Inzi was that he wanted continuity and coz Khaleel had played the last series, therefore they persisted with him.Well if Khaleel is of any use then why wasn't he playing on the green turf of Mohali??
I beleive it was Inzi and Bob that wanted Khaleel in the party instead of Shahid Nazeer, the explaination given by Inzi was that he wanted continuity and coz Khaleel had played the last series, therefore they persisted with him.Well if Khaleel is of any use then why wasn't he playing on the green turf of Mohali??
Its very much possible, and its not just about poor quality of Pakistan bowling attack. Pakistan bowlers and fielders are demoralised right now and they have a captain who's doing nothing to raise the spirits of the team. Whenever Pakistan team is in trouble, Inzi seems to be totally cluless.tooextracool said:
I think if Sehwag has a good chance of breaking Lara's record, hopefully he'll do it
SJS
Hall of Fame Member
Okay guys. Here is a quiz to test how good a captain you will make in test cricket.
Which do you prefer out of these two ?
A) Bowler/s who take 8 wickets in an innings at 26.7 runs each at a strike rate of 43 per wicket
OR
B) Bowlers who take 1 wicket, at an average of 249 and a strike rate of 330 !!
You want to know whats the 'tricky' part in this obvious question.
Ha ha. The second lot bowls faster !!!
Which do you prefer out of these two ?
A) Bowler/s who take 8 wickets in an innings at 26.7 runs each at a strike rate of 43 per wicket
OR
B) Bowlers who take 1 wicket, at an average of 249 and a strike rate of 330 !!
You want to know whats the 'tricky' part in this obvious question.
Ha ha. The second lot bowls faster !!!