why not? lol nah, the reason being pakistani batsmen faced bhajji after he was accused and he bowled the doosra as well...so suck it up i sayGladiatrsInBlue said:Shouldn't the batsmen refuse to face Malik when he will be throwing???
I mean why should Indian batsmen face throwers???
U r right, thats what i have been saying, it was a dissapointing total for Pakistanmofo123 said:shud be an interesting finish...319 on that wicket is nothing special...i wonder here we go anyway...GO GREENS!
Pakistan shud do the same for harbarjhan singh thenGladiatrsInBlue said:Shouldn't the batsmen refuse to face Malik when he will be throwing???
I mean why should Indian batsmen face throwers???
Or maybe Chakmal can bowl a few too.imranrabb said:Pakistan have 6 bowling options now
Sami
Naveed
Razzaq
Afridi
Malik
Danish
And maybe salman to chip in a few
I beg to differ! 319 on any wicket is good. This is just a batsmen dominated series. And the wicket is offering quite a bit of bounce it seems.mofo123 said:319 on that wicket is nothing special
mofo123 said:why not? lol nah, the reason being pakistani batsmen faced bhajji after he was accused and he bowled the doosra as well...so suck it up i say
no no dont get me wrong it is good...but is it good enough??? lets seeNnanden said:I beg to differ! 319 on any wicket is good. This is just a batsmen dominated series. And the wicket is offering quite a bit of bounce it seems.
And Malik can`t really have anything done to him during the game anyway. After the game perhaps, if he is found to have thrown, but not really during the game.
Yes, let us see! Less rubbishy talk (not aimed at you) more cricket.mofo123 said:no no dont get me wrong it is good...but is it good enough??? lets see
shut up, if he is not allowed to bowl then the umps will stop himGladiatrsInBlue said:Bhajji is allowed to bowl, Malik is not allowed as he is a clear chucker and a disgrace
Settle! Yes they do, I`m sure it will be revealed shortly...deeps said:overs docked ? do they still even do that?