Was harbhjan playing in any of those games?SJS said:Worst Bowling analysis of Kumble's career !!
He has gone for more runs in an innings five times before but nvere wicketless.
3-169
1-223
3-181
6-176
4-160
Year......Ground.......Opponents.........Kumble.........HarbhajanSehwag309 said:Was harbhjan playing in any of those games?
thanx Swa'jeetSJS said:Year......Ground.......Opponents.........Kumble.........Harbhajan
1997..........Colombo.....Sri Lank...............1-223..............NO
2002-3........Calcutta......Windies..............3-169...........5-115
2003-4........Mohali.........NZL....................3-181...........2-149
2003-4........Melbourne....Aust..................6-176..............NO
2005...........Mohali.........Pak....................4-160.............NO
2005...........Bangalore....Pak.....................0-159...........6-152
Another interesting stat is that Kumble's five wicket hauls are becoming costlier over time. If you take all his five-for's and put them in chronological order and take out the cumulative bowling average from the first five-for to the latest in Calcutta, there is a clear upward movement with more runs being given away per wicket even when he gets five or more wickets.Sehwag309 said:thanx Swa'jeet
So Calcitta is probably a solo place for either of them
its only into second daySehwag309 said:2.5 days, and 445-5, fantastic score, but not so good to go berserk and waste wickets
Good play by Palak, me thinks!
what record???Beleg said:Poor Kumble... This is one record he definately wouldn't want linked to his name.
It was a tricky ten overs to go through (though I feel Inzy delayed the declaration and Younis delayed the attack) and a wicket or two would have made a big difference. Sehwag looks ominous but it can change. If Pakistan dont get him early they can say goodbye to winning the test. If Sehwag stays till lunch India will be approaching 175-200. Then with the depth of the middle order, Pakistan will appear to hyave lost the initiative.mofo123 said:570...y does it feel like india r still in control...maybe coz they r...has any one else oticed razzaq and sami cant manage to get a straight seam, poistion and on the blue moon chance they do ....voila is swings!!!! sami needs to york sehwag his high bat lift is gonna make it difficult to get down o a 145kph yorker...everything else is just a four! arshad looked interesting...but aamir sohail saying he prefered him over saqlain i felt like slapping him...never liked him anyway too arrogant...
imensly for sehwag...lol but i think kaneria might cause him a problem he dismissed him for 6 over long on in the over he bowled...but i felt sehwag was a little edgey against him other then that one shot. draw is my prediction...although if india r 3 down by lunch then i think pakistan have a chanceSJS said:It was a tricky ten overs to go through (though I feel Inzy delayed the declaration and Younis delayed the attack) and a wicket or two would have made a big difference. Sehwag looks ominous but it can change. If Pakistan dont get him early they can say goodbye to winning the test. If Sehwag stays till lunch India will be approaching 175-200. Then with the depth of the middle order, Pakistan will appear to hyave lost the initiative.
But three days is a lot of time and anything can happen. India have a long way to go yet before securing this game.
It'll be fun tomorrow.
Agreed, and this problem becomes even more noticable when they leave the subcontinent. These batsman might get away with playing forward to everything in junior cricket and even their early international careers on low, slow subcontinental wickets, but when they go to Australia or South Africa or the West Indies they are going to fail endlessly. The Perth test where McGrath took 8 against them was a perfect example of the problems this style of play will get you in.SJS said:The point being that Pakistani young openers will continue to struggle against the moving ball until they get into the habit of playing back to slightly short of length deliveries (off the medium paced bowling of the type India posesses). Lunging forward to everything is suicidal but they dont seem to know any other way of playing.
You are right. I have always wondered why that is so. The Indian batsmen are invariably fairly good of the backfoot. Why is it different in Pakistan.FaaipDeOiad said:Agreed, and this problem becomes even more noticable when they leave the subcontinent. These batsman might get away with playing forward to everything in junior cricket and even their early international careers on low, slow subcontinental wickets, but when they go to Australia or South Africa or the West Indies they are going to fail endlessly. The Perth test where McGrath took 8 against them was a perfect example of the problems this style of play will get you in.
i they are made to follow on i think pakistan ahavea good chance other wise it could a drawmofo123 said:imensly for sehwag...lol but i think kaneria might cause him a problem he dismissed him for 6 over long on in the over he bowled...but i felt sehwag was a little edgey against him other then that one shot. draw is my prediction...although if india r 3 down by lunch then i think pakistan have a chance
pakistan have to take only 20 wickets to win not 30Duncan said:It's pretty safe this is going to be a draw. I don't see 30 more wickets falling on this pitch! India wins the series 1-0, but Pakistan can hold their head up high as everyone was predicting 3-0 and 2-0. The ODIs will be very exciting.
It should, in all probability be a draw but its a bit early to be 100% sure. Three days are nine sesssions of cricket, a lot can happen.Duncan said:It's pretty safe this is going to be a draw. I don't see 30 more wickets falling on this pitch! India wins the series 1-0, but Pakistan can hold their head up high as everyone was predicting 3-0 and 2-0. The ODIs will be very exciting.