U thinking Australian Test, aren't you. Inzamam will win the toss there for a change, if he bats 1st ' then we gonna think the same ole things which happened in Bangalore.Arjun said:I do have my doubts about the Test in Bangalore. The Indian team has a terrible record there, since the climate is very similar to places outside India, usually England or Australia. If the pitch offers more than a little bounce, it can be worrying. That said, there's no real quality in the Pakistani pace attack ot exploit these, save the erratic Sami.
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=2853&item=5176659963&rd=1Arjun said:...save the erratic Sami.
Oh man, u gotta be kidding meVroomfondel said:
They would have won ODI's even without themimranrabb said:Just heard pakistans 2 best bowlers shabbir and shoiab might be fit for the odis.
I agree. It's takes an idiot to drop a player who scored a 70 and a century in Australia just for failing in one test. If you're going to drop Salman Butt, drop Taufeeq Umar as well. Absolutely useless and it's clear that he will never become a great batsman. His record doesn't appear to be all that bad but that has a great deal to do with luck and out of the four innings Taufeeq has played in this series so far, Balaji has dismissed him all 4 times.mofo123 said:salman butt can not b dropped, this is wot i mean u all complain abt imran nazir and hasan raza and u r talking abt doing the same to salman one bad test and dont play him...its HIM who the future rests on right now and we need him in the team
Well it was a well planned victory for indians... Pakistan really gave a good fight and they were literally on top when india was under a bit of pressure in the second inningsat 156 for 4 when vvs.lax was retired hurt.... Hats off to dinesh karthick and ever so dependable wall Dravid,They dragged India to a winning position and not to forget contributions from Sachin in the second innings... These things ensured some superb bowling efforts from Kumble,Bhajji and Balaji..... The match was evenly poised until the final day when India had the last laugh... Such a match augurs well for test cricket.... It was evenly contested match...Sehwag309 said:Hmm
...They got it wrong
http://www.icc-cricket.com/icc/test/future.html
Possible Series Outcome
SEE ATTACHED PICTURE
no he's notmofo123 said:well no not really...at test level his bowling stats rnt all that as he has bowled with the likes of wasim and waqar, shoaib etc...therefore hasnt been the main wicket taker...batting is realiable...to b honest i think ur being a tad harsh...
Except that theres only 5 days in a test.FaaipDeOiad said:Escaped? Pakistan had a big lead by the time they finally declared in the first test. You talk about it like they scraped home by blocking out the dying overs with 8 or 9 down in the fourth innings - they actually had a fair chance at winning the game it there was another day to play.
mofo123 said:Let me b the first to day india did a gr8 job of getting pak out, and also the first to say pak did a lousy job of NOT getting out...lol but u gotta love the game the indians r just so strong at the moment maybe not the pace attack but batting and spin attack was too strong for pakistani players...for the next test id like to see salman butt in for taufeeq, keep shahid afridi opening. and i dont care if it isnt a spinners wicket get arshad khan in there for khalil its almost shamefull to call him test standard, i bowl better then him...no wait really! i do...
afridi
butt
younis
inzi
yoyo
kamal
razzaq
akmal
sami
arshad khan
kaneria
Something that i always maintained.mofo123 said:but rana is not a test quality player...im sorry to say his batting is better then his bowling
They've lost to Australia in 1998, they've lost to South Africa in 2000, they lost to Australia in 2004 and almost lost to the English in 2001, before rain cut in. It's the weather, and probably the pitch.Sehwag309 said:U thinking Australian Test, aren't you. Inzamam will win the toss there for a change, if he bats 1st ' then we gonna think the same ole things which happened in Bangalore.
Indian didn't have a good record against Pak at Eden too, so lets see
The reasons are entirely different, Sehwag has nothing to do with Afridi's selection, and Afridi's 59 is not the lone factor for his continuation as an opener in the next test match.SJS said:By persisting with Afridi in the opening Pakistan is making one of the following presumptions/statements
1) If Sehwag can play aggressively and be successful then why not Afridi. (Well there is a huge huge difference in their games. The only similarity is their aggresssion)
2) If he gets a 59 with this kind of batting, he is preferable to others who average less.(He will not get 59 everytime)
!
Before this series you were preferring Malik over Asim (though you can be excused coz u had not seen Asim then) but now you are trying to ruin Asim's career!!!3) He is better than the alternatives.(It looks like that but Pakistan needs to look beyond the regular openers. I think Asim Kamal has the game to open. He is one of the few Pakistanis, besides the middle order veterans, who plays comfortably off the backfoot. And he has a wonderful temprament. It is certainly worth a try)
Oh thanks for the caution ! I had actually made up my mind to order Asim Kamal to open.Choora said:Before this series you were preferring Malik over Asim (though you can be excused coz u had not seen Asim then) but now you are trying to ruin Asim's career!!!
lol, just wanted to quote this.SJS said:Oh thanks for the caution ! I had actually made up my mind to order Asim Kamal to open.