• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

***Official*** India Tour of South Africa, 2023/24

Spark

Global Moderator
Genuinely think choosing to bat first on this could go down as one of the worse coin toss decisions in recent memory. Complete shocker.
 

OverratedSanity

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Genuinely think choosing to bat first on this could go down as one of the worse coin toss decisions in recent memory. Complete shocker.
I mean, if they're bowled out soon , the conditions will barely have had time to change for India's batting. So it might not matter much.
 

Spark

Global Moderator
I mean, if they're bowled out soon , the conditions will barely have had time to change for India's batting. So it might not matter much.
Won't matter if they've only put on 50. The mental shock of it alone could be enough to see them spray it all over.

Or maybe they match India's bowling, in which case today could become extremely funny
 

Bahseph

International Debutant
I can't wait to see how SA go in NZ if this is their first choice test batting line up, our bowlers will be licking their lips in anticipation.
Elgar and Bavuma aside, over the last four years the rest of the batting is much of muchness. There really aren't any stand out young guns or steely vets. Bedingham has the best pedigree from any batting debutant in ages for SA. The blokes on that NZ tour have loads to play for because every position is up for grabs in that top 7 bar Bavuma IMHO.
 

Owzat

U19 Captain
In good bowling conditions it makes no sense to weaken your batting, SA getting what they deserve.
don't believe sense comes into cricket, sides play almost a set line up or 'balance' even though the 'balance' isn't

can be too much 'faith' in capabilities of middle and lower order batting, England at the World Cup might have had a line up if not Ali, Curran, Woakes, Rashid, Topley then similar in terms of all bar Topley can bat but in ODIs I wouldn't be expecting more than maybe 10-15 runs usual and 20-30 cameo sometimes max

Ali and Curran aren't such good, or even for me remotely good enough, bowlers that the 20-30 runs they might bring balances the bowling which could be 1 or 0 for 50-60 (Ali) or worse, and when batting even if say 240/4 or 5 you want support for any remaining batsman and partnerships which the 10-15 don't really bring, more regular wicket fall

that tail looks painfully long, Maharaj and Rabada can bat but saffers don't seem to have much depth these days, not that the 8-11 should be digging you out of holes when the top order are 34/5, that's a write off, but had it been say 160/5 then that's when a little more depth of batting helps a little - not at the expense of bowling, but how many bowlers are sooooooooooo good you can afford to not take batting into account or stick 3-4 in the side.....?
 

Top