Zinzan
Request Your Custom Title Now!
Hope you like KFC.I'd eat a mile of Taylor's ****, just to lick his asshole. The man has been epic for so long for the black caps.
Hope you like KFC.I'd eat a mile of Taylor's ****, just to lick his asshole. The man has been epic for so long for the black caps.
If the difference between a Neesham/de Grandhomme 10 over spell and that of a proper bowler is only 15 runs then yeah, sweet. But it won't be and you know it. This World Cup will be about taking wickets and trying to keep teams to around 300. If you can't do that you'll finish nowhere. I honestly wouldn't be surprised if they've decided that de Grandhomme's bowling won't be anywhere near good enough over there and therefore have decided already he's not going.As opposed to 315 with less batting?
Post your WC XI at this time. I may have missed if you posted previously.not athlais stupid "67 part timers = 1 good bowler" theory again
small english grounds on roads = part timers bye bye, free 80 runs
if you need your #8 to do all the run scoring then your team sucks and you're not going to win the world cup anyway. example a is right in front of you.
Called it a day, to go lay mile of shite I reckon.Taylor probably read this post and was disgusted enough that he decided to get out.
what are you talking about? They’re not going to be playing on rugby fields in England.not athlais stupid "67 part timers = 1 good bowler" theory again
small english grounds on roads = part timers bye bye, free 80 runs
if you need your #8 to do all the run scoring then your team sucks and you're not going to win the world cup anyway. example a is right in front of you.
The interview Stead gave the other day bascially implied that CdG is a lock for the squad as he is the "incumbent".If the difference between a Neesham/de Grandhomme 10 over spell and that of a proper bowler is only 15 runs then yeah, sweet. But it won't be and you know it. This World Cup will be about taking wickets and trying to keep teams to around 300. If you can't do that you'll finish nowhere. I honestly wouldn't be surprised if they've decided that de Grandhomme's bowling won't be anywhere near good enough over there and therefore have decided already he's not going.
guptillPost your XI at this time. I may have missed if you posted previously.
The interview Stead gave the other day bascially implied that CdG is a lock for the squad as he is the "incumbent".If the difference between a Neesham/de Grandhomme 10 over spell and that of a proper bowler is only 15 runs then yeah, sweet. But it won't be and you know it. This World Cup will be about taking wickets and trying to keep teams to around 300. If you can't do that you'll finish nowhere. I honestly wouldn't be surprised if they've decided that de Grandhomme's bowling won't be anywhere near good enough over there and therefore have decided already he's not going.
User name checks outI'd eat a mile of Taylor's ****, just to lick his asshole. The man has been epic for so long for the black caps.
Averages 29 with a SR of 105, that's good enough for a number 6 or 7.CdG would have been quite useful in this line up. Do not, ever, bench the big man.
Averages 40 with the bat at home though... and not really a big enough sample size of overseas games to be super critical yet. Had a pretty outstanding T20Blast too last year in English conditions.Averages 29 with a SR of 105, that's good enough for a number 6 or 7.
Top fieldsman too, that drop the other day was about the first i've seen him put down.Averages 40 with the bat at home though... and not really a big enough sample size of overseas games to be super critical yet. Had a pretty outstanding T20Blast too last year in English conditions.