flibbertyjibber
Request Your Custom Title Now!
Perfect time for a trolling 30 by Broad. Probably be out for 12 though.
Regarding your second point, yes, and they are absolutely entitled to. I suspect that's due to a variety of reasons that go beyond how good the cricket is, but that's their prerogative as paying customers.Yes but you can see Kane Williamson, Abbot, Morkel, Azhar Ali, Elgar, Ross Taylor play in the championship. The Shield is just built to be a feeder for Australia. Nobody is going to want to support teams that exist merely as subservient feeder clubs. In England we care about our counties. Some people I know love county cricket and are uninterested in test cricket.
I can't agree with that. You look at the spending power of Surrey for instance who are beginning to resemble a ''first-class all-stars''. I'd imagine they would steamroll all Shield sides except a New South Wales with their full internationals present (including the sandpaper twosome).Regarding your second point, yes, and they are absolutely entitled to. I suspect that's due to a variety of reasons that go beyond how good the cricket is, but that's their prerogative as paying customers.
Going back to your first point, even allowing for a handful of good overseas players, I'd still argue that the better English players are spread too thinly to produce a high standard of teams.
I also think with how thinly the English quality is spread is part of the reason we struggle so much to produce test quality players, there's not enough cut throat competition for places imo.Regarding your second point, yes, and they are absolutely entitled to. I suspect that's due to a variety of reasons that go beyond how good the cricket is, but that's their prerogative as paying customers.
Going back to your first point, even allowing for a handful of good overseas players, I'd still argue that the better English players are spread too thinly to produce a high standard of teams.
True for every 1st class competition, not just the English one. The internationals swing things a bit though.Going back to your first point, even allowing for a handful of good overseas players, I'd still argue that the better English players are spread too thinly to produce a high standard of teams.
Yes, but there was no professional infrastructure in any other country in those days and the model is outmoded - England's Test team would do much better if the domestic structure were completely overhauled, but I sincerely hope it never happens even if we do have to put up with occasional defeat from these colonial upstartsAnd yet ''eighteen counties (in two divisions from 2000)'' produced Cook, Strauss, Bell, Root, Collingwood, Flintoff, Jones and Broad? Every player I listed there played for a different county, and were inherently products of those counties.
Whenever the test team are garbage the championship gets the blame, yet it wasn't praised when the national team performed under the 2003-05 and 2009-13 sides.
Heck, there were 17 counties in the mid-late '20s (Percy Chapman era), 17 counties during the '50s Hutton/May era, 17 counties during the late-60s early '70s Illingworth era - all great periods for English test cricket.
I'd feel more sympathy for him this test if he was actually pitching it up, but he's not.Poor Shami
I just wished the championship wasn't pushed to the tail ends of the season and was played all thought the summer instead of all the short form stuff.Yes, but there was no professional infrastructure in any other country in those days and the model is outmoded - England's Test team would do much better if the domestic structure were completely overhauled, but I sincerely hope it never happens even if we do have to put up with occasional defeat from these colonial upstarts