• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* India Tour of England 2018

OverratedSanity

Request Your Custom Title Now!
No. Strike rotation is always a good thing, especially when you're struggling to put bat on ball. That being said, it was just a bad bad call from Kohli.
Only run if you place the ball into the gap properly and there's no one within 10 feet of the thing. This sounds stupid yes, but I'm convinced if teams adopted this over time, they'd put up marginally better scores. Runouts are just ****ing stupid when there no run rate pressure.
 

Pratters

Cricket, Lovely Cricket
Only run if you place the ball into the gap properly and there's no one within 10 feet of the thing. This sounds stupid yes, but I'm convinced if teams adopted this over time, they'd put up marginally better scores. Runouts are just ****ing stupid when there no run rate pressure.

When you know how to run, quick runs are good as 1. They are runs 2. Helps rotate strike.
 

Black_Warrior

Cricketer Of The Year
Only run if you place the ball into the gap properly and there's no one within 10 feet of the thing. This sounds stupid yes, but I'm convinced if teams adopted this over time, they'd put up marginally better scores. Runouts are just ****ing stupid when there no run rate pressure.
If Kohli actually went all the way and made the dive, there is a high possibility that he would have made it because then you're relying on
1) Direct hit
2) Keeper gathering it cleanly and clipping the bails

This was more poor calling than anything else
 

Spark

Global Moderator
If Kohli actually went all the way and made the dive, there is a high possibility that he would have made it because then you're relying on
1) Direct hit
2) Keeper gathering it cleanly and clipping the bails

This was more poor calling than anything else
at this level you really should be assuming those things will happen and not taking that chance (but yes **** calling was the main cause here, as it usually is in run outs)
 

OverratedSanity

Request Your Custom Title Now!
at this level you really should be assuming those things will happen and not taking that chance
That's kind of the point I'm making tbh. These runs where you actually need to go all out to ensure you make your ground... they just don't seem worth it in the longer format.
 

Spark

Global Moderator
That's kind of the point I'm making tbh. These runs where you actually need to go all out to ensure you make your ground... they just don't seem worth it in the longer format.
Yeah, they feel kind of unnecessary even if they mathematically work, because in the end it just freaks out your partner and disrupts the partnership, making a proper mix-up that much more likely.
 

King Pietersen

International Captain
Annoys me how long it takes to get back on the field in a Test match. The covers are off, it's stopped raining yet inspection isn't until 3 which means no cricket until probably 3.30. Get out there now, tell the players to start getting ready, inspect and be back on the field for 3.
 

91Jmay

International Coach
Annoys me how long it takes to get back on the field in a Test match. The covers are off, it's stopped raining yet inspection isn't until 3 which means no cricket until probably 3.30. Get out there now, tell the players to start getting ready, inspect and be back on the field for 3.
Setting a time for an inspection is the most cricket load of bollocks ever.
 

weldone

Hall of Fame Member
Inspection at 3. That means match re-start at 3:30? When does the tea take place? 3:40? So, that's enough time for India to lose 2 more. And then they'll come back at 4, lose another wicket and be off again for rain at 4:02
 

Kirkut

International Regular
Had it not been for picturesque cricket grounds, the romantic weather and the swinging ball, test cricket should never be played in rainy England. Play test matches under the blazing hot sun instead.
 

weldone

Hall of Fame Member
Had it not been for picturesque cricket grounds, the romantic weather and the swinging ball, test cricket should never be played in rainy England. Play test matches under the blazing hot sun instead.
It didn't rain for the last 3 months in London - yesterday saw the first rain.
 

King Pietersen

International Captain
We've had 45 minutes of ****ing sitting around while the umpires had a nice cup of tea and biscuit. They've finally got off their arse to look at the pitch and by the time play starts again those massive clouds will come across and it'll start pissing down again. Cricket really does shoot itself in the bollocks sometimes.
 

Top