Not really. Patto swung it away at 90+mph, like Steyn. Cummins is a jet but has a different MO.Would take Cummins over Pattinson any day tbh. Far better comparison with young Steyn too; if anything, a little distance ahead of Steyn at comparable stage.
If I make it my week's goal to annoy you, will you still call me a **** with the regards thing you are doing now?It’s nearly September, that time each year we get the news about Patto’s latest injury which will rule him out for he season. It’s such a shame, he’s mad as a cut snake and quality to boot. Could’ve been our Dale Steyn.
https://www.smh.com.au/sport/cricke...-domestic-one-day-series-20180622-p4zn57.html
My best,
Burgey.
Nahhhhhhh.Would take Cummins over Pattinson any day tbh. Far better comparison with young Steyn too; if anything, a little distance ahead of Steyn at comparable stage.
Is this supposed to be humour?Kohli: I don't really care if I get runs or not. I don't feel I have to prove anything about my game anywhere.
Anderson: Lies. Utter lies. Of course you care.
Kohli: My only focus is to take Indian cricket forward
Mainstream media, social media, Cricket Web: No you **** you average 13 in England. Anderson is your daddy
Kohli: Alright **** you asked for this
Hi Shri,If I make it my week's goal to annoy you, will you still call me a **** with the regards thing you are doing now?
Hope a black cat crosses your path,
Shri
That's because you have no clue. They've blooded batsmen.......****ing heaps of them (just about everyone in the championship + some........in fact I'm waiting for the call myself If Cook does decide to call it time)I’d rather see them blood a new batsman.
NoIs this supposed to be humour?
Ripped from the pages of PakPassionIs this supposed to be humour?
Did he make Earl grey for you, in your house, before dinnerThat's because you have no clue. They've blooded batsmen.......****ing heaps of them (just about everyone in the championship + some........in fact I'm waiting for the call myself If Cook does decide to call it time)
Our best batsmen can't make a hundred.....7 tests ago Cook was 244*. And this is the guy you want gone??......gtfo.
On the flattest wicket ever, when there was no pressure because the Ashes were lost and when Starc was injured. Nice mate where was his hundred in Brisbane, or against Pakistan. Oh wait, didn’t happen.That's because you have no clue. They've blooded batsmen.......****ing heaps of them (just about everyone in the championship + some........in fact I'm waiting for the call myself If Cook does decide to call it time)
Our best batsmen can't make a hundred.....7 tests ago Cook was 244*. And this is the guy you want gone??......gtfo.
Who else was making the hundreds in those tests mate?On the flattest wicket ever, when there was no pressure because the Ashes were lost and when Starc was injured. Nice mate where was his hundred in Brisbane, or against Pakistan. Oh wait, didn’t happen.
Both amusing & true.That's because you have no clue. They've blooded batsmen.......****ing heaps of them (just about everyone in the championship + some........in fact
Bairstow, Malan, Stoneman got England off to a few good starts, Root made quite a lot of runs, despite his failure to convert. Context has to be taken into account. One daddy hundred in a dead rubber on a wicket that was never going to give a result doesn’t cut it.Who else was making the hundreds in those tests mate?
Or in your case “If you ignored all his **** posts, he never made any posts at all.”The classic 'if you ignore all the runs he made, then he made no runs' argument
Never grows old